getProgrammaticFuntionName typo in offapi/com/sun/star/sheet/XAddIn.idl

Stephan Bergmann sbergman at redhat.com
Tue Oct 12 07:54:11 UTC 2021


On 11/10/2021 19:24, Julien Nabet wrote:
> (Sorry, without Nabble anymore, I don't know how to properly respond).
> 
> In response to Stephan:
> 
> "And if it would turn out not be used, why bother fixing the typo? :)"
> 
> Just to have the right spelling because it's boring to see this kind of 
> typo ("boring" is an understatement for me, personnally I really hate 
> letting typos)
> 
> So can we fix this or not?

I would strongly suggest not to, as css.sheet.XAddIn is an interface 
intended to be implemented by 3rd-party code (see e.g. 
odk/examples/DevelopersGuide/Spreadsheet/ExampleAddIn.java).

> On 10/10/2021 11:13, Julien Nabet wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I noticed a typo in function name "getProgrammaticFuntionName" instead 
>> of "getProgrammaticFunctionName".
>>
>> (see 
>> https://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/offapi/com/sun/star/sheet/XAddIn.idl?r=2b383d19#51). 
>>
>>
>> Usually I would have supposed we're stuck since it's in a public 
>> interface but the current implementations just return an empty 
>> OUString (unless I missed something) so wonder if it's really used.
>>
>> Julien
>>
>> PS : "Errare humanum est" but just wonder why these function names 
>> aren't double/triple-checked by at least 2 people before being 
>> published...



More information about the LibreOffice mailing list