Crash test update, "validation?"

[Thorsten Behrens]

Hi Miklos, hi Caolán,

Miklos Vajna wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 03:08:17PM +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> > Do we care about the "validationErrors", I've never looked at them and
> > maybe the turnaround time might be faster if we drop validation?
> 
> I think it's useful information, but looking at the cost of generating
> them with that java-based tool and the benefit (vs crashtest data,
> user-supplied bugreports, etc), perhaps it's an overkill to run these
> all the time.
> 
That was added IIRC quite a few years ago to make sure we're not
inadvertently breaking filters - so I'd agree it's useful to have. If
we're not acting on it currently, then there's no harm running it less
frequently (or perhaps it should be part of the (ESC) reporting, so it
gets more attention?)

Cheers,

-- Thorsten
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 1032 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/attachments/20220816/74806801/attachment.sig>