Is it still possible to compile LibreOffice 24 for Linux 32-bit? (part 2)

[Rene Engelhard]

Hi,

please don't break threads.

Am 10.02.24 um 00:53 schrieb Escuelas Linux:
>
> -"Debian still ships LibreOffice on 32bit archs, as do other 
> distributions."
>
>
> Oh! Thanks for the tip! I was not aware that Debian even has binary 
> LibreOffice 24.2 32-bit packages, albeit in the unstable branch.
>
You should check.

Also in testing and even for bookworm-backports:

https://packages.debian.org/search?suite=bookworm-backports&keywords=libreoffice

> -"I do -g1 in Debian. LTO works".
>
>
> Where should I add the -g1 parameter?
>
>
There once was --enable-symbols=SMALL. Once was dropped upstream, I 
added it back and use that one:

https://salsa.debian.org/libreoffice-team/libreoffice/libreoffice/-/blob/master/patches/debian-debug.diff?ref_type=heads 
together with

https://salsa.debian.org/libreoffice-team/libreoffice/libreoffice/-/blob/master/rules?ref_type=heads#L1015 
and

https://salsa.debian.org/libreoffice-team/libreoffice/libreoffice/-/blob/master/rules?ref_type=heads#L1046


So Setting CXXFLAGS appropriately should just work.

> -"And somehow the testtools bridgetest fails when building with gcc >= 
> 13, 12 works. Haven't found a solution yet.)"
>
>
> I'm using gcc 13! Maybe this could be the cause of my compilation 
> failures?
>
No, yours is the 4GB limit.

Which also is the case with PAE since that (ttbomk) does NOT affect how 
many memory *one process* has available.

Just that the system itself can handle more.


Regards,


Rene
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/attachments/20240210/7edcdb34/attachment.htm>