ESC meeting minutes: 2025-07-03

[Mike Kaganski]

On 7/3/2025 7:35 PM, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> * Bisected bugs open: keyword 'bisected'
>    + more accurate - down to a single commit.
>    + http://bit.ly/2dyIfDy
>    +
>
>      done by:
>         vijaya chandra         4
>         Xisco Fauli            4
>         Weghorn, Michael       1
>
>
> * Bibisected bugs open: keyword 'bibisected'
>    + http://bit.ly/2cSCXlS
>    +
>
>      done by:
>         vijaya chandra         4
>         Xisco Fauli            4
>         Weghorn, Michael       1 


Is there any reason to still have that "bisected" vs. "bibisected" 
difference? IIUC, in the beginning, the bibisect repos were not as fine 
as now, and it could make sense. I don't believe that we have a real 
option to do bisects other than bibisects? And anyway, if there will be 
a case where there would be a difference, it would be explained in the 
comment - I don't think anyone would actually *expect* to check keywords 
to know that.

A proposal is to drop the "bibisected" keyword from Bugzilla, and the 
respective section from the minutes.


-- 

Best regards,

Mike Kaganski