Hi guys,<div><br></div><div>In bug 95217 - <a href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95217">https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95217</a> - Persian test in a webpage encoded as UTF-8 is corrupting.</div><div><br></div><div>If I take the webpage and save to an HTML file encoded as UTF8, then there are no problems and the Persian text comes through fine. However, when connecting to a webserver directly, the HTTP header correctly gives the content type as utf8.</div><div><br></div><div>I did a test using Charles Proxy with its SSL interception feature turned on and pointed Safari to <a href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=119818">https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=119818</a></div><div><br></div><div>The following headers are gathered:</div><div><br></div><div><pre class="bz_comment_text" id="comment_text_7" style="font-size:medium;width:50em">HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2015 01:41:30 GMT
Content-Type: text/html; name="text.html"; charset=UTF-8
X-xss-protection: 1; mode=block
Content-disposition: inline; filename="text.html"
X-content-type-options: nosniff</pre></div><br><div>Some warnings are spat out that it editeng's eehtml can't detect the encoding. I initially thought it was looking for a BOM, which makes no sense for a webpage, but that's wrong. Instead, for some reason the headers don't seem to be processed and the HTML parser is falling back to ISO-8859-1 and not UTF8 as the character encoding.</div><div><br></div><div>We seem to use Neon to make the GET request to the webserver. A few observations:</div><div><br></div><div>1. We detect a server OK response as an error</div><div>2. (Probably more to the point) I believe PROPFIND is being used, but actually even though the function being used indicates a PROPFIND verb is used a GET is used as is normal but the headers aren't being stored. This ,Evans that when the parser looks for the headers to find the encoding it's not finding anything, resulting in a fallback to ISO-8859-1.</div><div><br></div><div>One easy thing (doesn't solve the root issue) is that wouldn't it be a better idea to fallback to UTF8 and not ISO-8859-1, given ISO-8859-1 is really just a subset of UTF-8?</div><div><br></div><div>Any pointers on how to get to the bottom of this would be appreciated, I'm honestly not up on webdav or Neon.</div><div><br></div><div>Chris Sherlock</div>