<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body smarttemplateinserted="true" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 1/3/2017 1:17 PM, Kaganski Mike wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:AM4PR1001MB1426FA3894CAC09E602A74EFD66E0@AM4PR1001MB1426.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM" type="cite">
Sometimes, a patch that was thought by me as a correct patch (ant dso was submitted for review), turns out to need some rework; and then it goes through numerous iterations until it gets ready. I don't expect initial (or other) reviewers to spend their time
to review each iteration, and I don't know of a way to make already submittes change s draft (except resubmitting another change, which isn't always desirable); so when ready, I mark it "CR+1" - i.e. fine with me, but needs other's review, with accompanying
comment that now I regard it ready and ask others to do actual review. As gerrit explicitly tells that it's what CR+1 means, I don't think it's a fancy thing.<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
But I suppose a better thing is to mark it -1 in the beginning, and revert to 0 when ready.<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
Best regards,<br>
Mike Kaganski</div>
<span class="st4cursor"></span>
</body>
</html>