<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p>Hello Lionel, Robert and Alex,</p>
<p>I didn't reproduce the pb of
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122779">https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122779</a> "(<span
id="summary_container"><span id="short_desc_nonedit_display">FILEOPEN
(BASE) Connection to Oracle DB via ODBC ends in [ODBC][ORACLE]
Optional Feature not implemented)</span></span>"</p>
<p>but had a segfault when closing table.</p>
<p>Trying to take a look at this, I noticed that there were several
ODBC versions and that some functions were deprecated in ODBC 3.X,
see
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://docs.microsoft.com/fr-fr/SQL/odbc/reference/appendixes/mapping-deprecated-functions?view=sql-server-2017">https://docs.microsoft.com/fr-fr/SQL/odbc/reference/appendixes/mapping-deprecated-functions?view=sql-server-2017</a></p>
<p>According to
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Database_Connectivity">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Database_Connectivity</a>, ODBC 3.0
has been released in 1995.</p>
<p>Would you be ok to remove and replace deprecated functions from
ODBC < 3.0 or do you think about some cons?</p>
<p>The goal would be to make some cleaning about ODBC function calls
in LO, it may make LO more robust.<br>
</p>
<p>Any specific thoughts about ODBC?<br>
</p>
<p>Remark : I don't say I'd be able to do it but thought that a
bugtracker about it could be relevant.</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Julien Nabet</p>
<p>PS : I put LO Dev forum in cc so the information is spread
directly.<br>
</p>
</body>
</html>