<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <font size="+1"><font face="DejaVu Serif">I still have two 32 bit
        machines which using KDE4 which run LO 6.2.8</font>.  Might be
      wrong but I don't think LO 6.3 will run on a KDE4 machine.<br>
    </font><br>
    <font size="+1">Alex</font><br>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 19/07/2020 16:00, Michael H wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAJ9hia-uJESv6hxSvY-4S6UBTie71F0cuYFR=tT4oFYPeLOFEw@mail.gmail.com">
      <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div class="gmail_default"
          style="font-family:garamond,serif;font-size:large">I'd say
          that it's likely that a majority of computers still running
          win7 are running 32bit. <br>
          <br>
          I'd also suggest that all those users would prefer a stable
          6.0 or 6.1 (or maybe 6.3) (no big interface changes from LO
          3.2) to remain installable and maintained for security, rather
          than installing LO 7 on them. That is anyone looking for a
          32bit install is trying to restore a computer back to its 2010
          state, with current security patches. <br>
          <br>
          So, I'd vote for maintaining a separate feature Exact 6.3, or
          6.1 32 bit version, and dropping 32bit from 7.0. </div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <div class="gmail_quote">
        <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Sun, Jul 19, 2020 at 9:44
          AM Ralf Quint <<a href="mailto:freedos.la@gmail.com"
            moz-do-not-send="true">freedos.la@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
        </div>
        <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
          0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">On
          7/19/2020 7:27 AM, Thorsten Behrens wrote:<br>
          > Hi Dante,<br>
          ><br>
          > Dante Doménech wrote:<br>
          >> Isn't it time to start removing windows 32 support?<br>
          >><br>
          > I believe that would be premature. There's still a
          sizeable fraction<br>
          > of users running Windows 7 [1], which itself likely has a
          sizeable<br>
          > fraction of x86 installations - no hard data though [2].<br>
          <br>
          +1<br>
          <br>
          Ralf<br>
          <br>
          <br>
          -- <br>
          This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus
          software.<br>
          <a href="https://www.avast.com/antivirus" rel="noreferrer"
            target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.avast.com/antivirus</a><br>
          <br>
          _______________________________________________<br>
          LibreOffice mailing list<br>
          <a href="mailto:LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org"
            target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org</a><br>
          <a
            href="https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice"
            rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice</a><br>
        </blockquote>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org">LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice">https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>