<!DOCTYPE html> <html data-lt-installed="true"> <head> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"> </head> <body style="padding-bottom: 1px;"> Hi Ilmary, then I probably misunderstood the ESC minutes from 2024/02/29: + cmake find modules for SDK examples (Hossein) + Set of patches from Konstantin (WIP) <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/162978">https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/162978</a> + Similar structure is needed for qmake + would this mean duplicated build systems for each example? (Miklos) + for each example, the maintenance would be low, hopefully (Hossein) + would be the goal to have old/cmake/qmake, 3 parallel build systems? (Miklos) + yes, for now (Hossein) + the cmake part for each example is small + smells like explosion of combinatorics (Stephan) + would be careful before going down that road + if the end goal is to settle down on cmake, love it (Thorsten) + but 3 in the long run is far from ideal. + cmake is not that exotic, we require it already for doxygen (Miklos) + which makes it supported on CI already (Thorsten) + if interested in doing the work + update the docs, then why not, as long as it's a single build system (Stephan) + but then do avoid qmake, and do switch over from gmake at the end + avoids the exploson Sorry for the noise <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Am 16.03.24 um 17:18 schrieb Ilmari Lauhakangas: </div> <blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:12dea404-f706-45da-b100-2ff62ed00f63@libreoffice.org">On 16.3.2024 17.41, Sophia Schröder wrote: <blockquote type="cite">Hi all, Just a side note from a community member: I don't know how much the hassle and the costs are, but LibreOffice wants to switch to Cmake anyway. (I saw Cmake mentioned at Linaro's webpage). </blockquote> There has been quite a lot of work toward building LibreOffice with Meson. There has not been discussion about investing time into building with CMake. Ilmari </blockquote> </body> <lt-container></lt-container> </html>