[Libva] Fwd: FGLRX detection code overly restrictive

[Gwenole Beauchesne]

Hi,

2011/10/9 Stephan Diestelhorst <stephan.diestelhorst at gmail.com>:
> This too.. please comment, test and if deemed alright add to
> source. Thanks!

Thanks for the patch. I will have a look at it tomorrow. The success =
(*driver_name != NULL) is definitely the right option. I might fix the
display problem differently though, depending on how much information
ADL can provide.

Regards,
Gwenole.

> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Stephan Diestelhorst <stephan.diestelhorst at gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 8:28 PM
> Subject: Re: [Libva] FGLRX detection code overly restrictive
> To: Gwenole Beauchesne <gb.devel at gmail.com>
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Stephan Diestelhorst
> <stephan.diestelhorst at gmail.com> wrote:
>> How does one detect whether this is a multi-monitor setup? According
>> to the X documentation :0 is equal to :0.0, since the first screen is chosen
>> by default. I'll try to incorporate that into a patch.
>>
>>> The proper fixes would be:
>>> 1. Don't return success if no valid match was found.
>>> 2. Account for ":0" cases in a single monitor system.
>>
>> Will hack sth together!
>
> This has got more ugly than anticipated, but works for me..
>
> Stephan
>
> _______________________________________________
> Libva mailing list
> Libva at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libva
>
>