[Libva] VPP Deinterlacing problem
Steven Toth
stoth at kernellabs.com
Fri May 16 09:36:42 PDT 2014
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 10:01 PM, Zhao, Halley <halley.zhao at intel.com> wrote:
>> Question: Does Motion Adaption implementation (unlike Bob) require two distinct source surfaces plus an ADDITIONAL surface for the result?
> Yes. A new surface is required for the result surface.
Thanks. Just to be clear, the resulting deinterlaced content is
written to the forward_reference surface, correct?
- Steve
--
Steven Toth - Kernel Labs
http://www.kernellabs.com
More information about the Libva
mailing list