[Libva] VPP Deinterlacing problem

Steven Toth stoth at kernellabs.com
Fri May 16 09:36:42 PDT 2014


On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 10:01 PM, Zhao, Halley <halley.zhao at intel.com> wrote:
>> Question: Does Motion Adaption implementation (unlike Bob) require two distinct source surfaces plus an ADDITIONAL surface for the result?
> Yes. A new surface is required for the result surface.

Thanks. Just to be clear, the resulting deinterlaced content is
written to the forward_reference surface, correct?

- Steve

-- 
Steven Toth - Kernel Labs
http://www.kernellabs.com


More information about the Libva mailing list