[Lima] [PATCH v4 13/38] drm: lima: fix common struct sg_table related issues

[Marek Szyprowski]

The Documentation/DMA-API-HOWTO.txt states that the dma_map_sg() function
returns the number of the created entries in the DMA address space.
However the subsequent calls to the dma_sync_sg_for_{device,cpu}() and
dma_unmap_sg must be called with the original number of the entries
passed to the dma_map_sg().

struct sg_table is a common structure used for describing a non-contiguous
memory buffer, used commonly in the DRM and graphics subsystems. It
consists of a scatterlist with memory pages and DMA addresses (sgl entry),
as well as the number of scatterlist entries: CPU pages (orig_nents entry)
and DMA mapped pages (nents entry).

It turned out that it was a common mistake to misuse nents and orig_nents
entries, calling DMA-mapping functions with a wrong number of entries or
ignoring the number of mapped entries returned by the dma_map_sg()
function.

To avoid such issues, lets use a common dma-mapping wrappers operating
directly on the struct sg_table objects and use scatterlist page
iterators where possible. This, almost always, hides references to the
nents and orig_nents entries, making the code robust, easier to follow
and copy/paste safe.

Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski at samsung.com>
---
For more information, see '[PATCH v4 00/38] DRM: fix struct sg_table nents
vs. orig_nents misuse' thread:
https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20200512085710.14688-1-m.szyprowski@samsung.com/T/
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_gem.c | 11 ++++++++---
 drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_vm.c  |  5 ++---
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_gem.c
index 5404e0d..cda43f6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_gem.c
@@ -69,8 +69,7 @@ int lima_heap_alloc(struct lima_bo *bo, struct lima_vm *vm)
 		return ret;
 
 	if (bo->base.sgt) {
-		dma_unmap_sg(dev, bo->base.sgt->sgl,
-			     bo->base.sgt->nents, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
+		dma_unmap_sgtable(dev, bo->base.sgt, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL, 0);
 		sg_free_table(bo->base.sgt);
 	} else {
 		bo->base.sgt = kmalloc(sizeof(*bo->base.sgt), GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -80,7 +79,13 @@ int lima_heap_alloc(struct lima_bo *bo, struct lima_vm *vm)
 		}
 	}
 
-	dma_map_sg(dev, sgt.sgl, sgt.nents, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
+	ret = dma_map_sgtable(dev, &sgt, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL, 0);
+	if (ret) {
+		sg_free_table(&sgt);
+		kfree(bo->base.sgt);
+		bo->base.sgt = NULL;
+		return ret;
+	}
 
 	*bo->base.sgt = sgt;
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_vm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_vm.c
index 5b92fb8..2b2739a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_vm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_vm.c
@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ int lima_vm_bo_add(struct lima_vm *vm, struct lima_bo *bo, bool create)
 	if (err)
 		goto err_out1;
 
-	for_each_sg_dma_page(bo->base.sgt->sgl, &sg_iter, bo->base.sgt->nents, 0) {
+	for_each_sgtable_dma_page(bo->base.sgt, &sg_iter, 0) {
 		err = lima_vm_map_page(vm, sg_page_iter_dma_address(&sg_iter),
 				       bo_va->node.start + offset);
 		if (err)
@@ -298,8 +298,7 @@ int lima_vm_map_bo(struct lima_vm *vm, struct lima_bo *bo, int pageoff)
 	mutex_lock(&vm->lock);
 
 	base = bo_va->node.start + (pageoff << PAGE_SHIFT);
-	for_each_sg_dma_page(bo->base.sgt->sgl, &sg_iter,
-			     bo->base.sgt->nents, pageoff) {
+	for_each_sgtable_dma_page(bo->base.sgt, &sg_iter, pageoff) {
 		err = lima_vm_map_page(vm, sg_page_iter_dma_address(&sg_iter),
 				       base + offset);
 		if (err)
-- 
1.9.1