[PATCH] drm: Explicitly include correct DT includes

[Rob Herring]

On Sun, Jul 16, 2023 at 3:26 AM Heiko Stuebner <heiko at sntech.de> wrote:
>
> Am Freitag, 14. Juli 2023, 19:45:34 CEST schrieb Rob Herring:
> > The DT of_device.h and of_platform.h date back to the separate
> > of_platform_bus_type before it as merged into the regular platform bus.
> > As part of that merge prepping Arm DT support 13 years ago, they
> > "temporarily" include each other. They also include platform_device.h
> > and of.h. As a result, there's a pretty much random mix of those include
> > files used throughout the tree. In order to detangle these headers and
> > replace the implicit includes with struct declarations, users need to
> > explicitly include the correct includes.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh at kernel.org>
> > ---
>
> [...]
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw-mipi-dsi-rockchip.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw-mipi-dsi-rockchip.c
> > index 917e79951aac..2744d8f4a6fa 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw-mipi-dsi-rockchip.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw-mipi-dsi-rockchip.c
> > @@ -12,7 +12,9 @@
> >  #include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
> >  #include <linux/module.h>
> >  #include <linux/of_device.h>
> > +#include <linux/of_platform.h>
> >  #include <linux/phy/phy.h>
> > +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> >  #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> >  #include <linux/regmap.h>
>
> I'm not sure if I'm just misreading something, but in all other places
> of_device.h gets removed while here is stays as an include. Is this
> correct this way?

Yes, because of_match_device() is used.

Rob