Mesa (master): i965/vec4: Drop writemasks on scratch reads.

[Kenneth Graunke]

Module: Mesa
Branch: master
Commit: 23caba862a001f82ef352307a79bebf7ef910959
URL:    http://cgit.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/commit/?id=23caba862a001f82ef352307a79bebf7ef910959

Author: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth at whitecape.org>
Date:   Wed Dec 10 00:52:50 2014 -0800

i965/vec4: Drop writemasks on scratch reads.

This code is complete nonsense and has apparently existed since I first
implemented register spilling in the VS two years ago.

Scratch reads are SEND messages, which ignore the destination writemask.

The comment about "data that may not have been written to scratch" is
also confusing - we always spill whole 4x2 registers, so such data
simply does not exist.  We can safely ignore the writemask.

Signed-off-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth at whitecape.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88 at gmail.com>

---

 src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_vec4_reg_allocate.cpp |    8 --------
 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_vec4_reg_allocate.cpp b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_vec4_reg_allocate.cpp
index 828a70e..e8e2185 100644
--- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_vec4_reg_allocate.cpp
+++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_vec4_reg_allocate.cpp
@@ -335,14 +335,6 @@ vec4_visitor::spill_reg(int spill_reg_nr)
             inst->src[i].reg = virtual_grf_alloc(1);
             dst_reg temp = dst_reg(inst->src[i]);
 
-            /* Only read the necessary channels, to avoid overwriting the rest
-             * with data that may not have been written to scratch.
-             */
-            temp.writemask = 0;
-            for (int c = 0; c < 4; c++)
-               temp.writemask |= (1 << BRW_GET_SWZ(inst->src[i].swizzle, c));
-            assert(temp.writemask != 0);
-
             emit_scratch_read(block, inst, temp, spill_reg, spill_offset);
          }
       }