Mesa (master): spirv: Add a vtn_block() helper

GitLab Mirror gitlab-mirror at kemper.freedesktop.org
Fri Apr 3 21:11:49 UTC 2020


Module: Mesa
Branch: master
Commit: 8c5c65d0d6a64a3bcc057e5cf61a94eda4b72f86
URL:    http://cgit.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/commit/?id=8c5c65d0d6a64a3bcc057e5cf61a94eda4b72f86

Author: Jason Ekstrand <jason at jlekstrand.net>
Date:   Wed Feb 12 14:00:23 2020 -0600

spirv: Add a vtn_block() helper

Reviewed-by: Caio Marcelo de Oliveira Filho <caio.oliveira at intel.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/3820>

---

 src/compiler/spirv/vtn_cfg.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/compiler/spirv/vtn_cfg.c b/src/compiler/spirv/vtn_cfg.c
index 25e2f285e79..e07ccf70e30 100644
--- a/src/compiler/spirv/vtn_cfg.c
+++ b/src/compiler/spirv/vtn_cfg.c
@@ -24,6 +24,12 @@
 #include "vtn_private.h"
 #include "nir/nir_vla.h"
 
+static struct vtn_block *
+vtn_block(struct vtn_builder *b, uint32_t value_id)
+{
+   return vtn_value(b, value_id, vtn_value_type_block)->block;
+}
+
 static struct vtn_pointer *
 vtn_load_param_pointer(struct vtn_builder *b,
                        struct vtn_type *param_type,
@@ -394,8 +400,7 @@ vtn_add_case(struct vtn_builder *b, struct vtn_switch *swtch,
              struct vtn_block *break_block,
              uint32_t block_id, uint64_t val, bool is_default)
 {
-   struct vtn_block *case_block =
-      vtn_value(b, block_id, vtn_value_type_block)->block;
+   struct vtn_block *case_block = vtn_block(b, block_id);
 
    /* Don't create dummy cases that just break */
    if (case_block == break_block)
@@ -496,10 +501,8 @@ vtn_cfg_walk_blocks(struct vtn_builder *b, struct list_head *cf_list,
          list_addtail(&loop->node.link, cf_list);
          block->loop = loop;
 
-         struct vtn_block *new_loop_break =
-            vtn_value(b, block->merge[1], vtn_value_type_block)->block;
-         struct vtn_block *new_loop_cont =
-            vtn_value(b, block->merge[2], vtn_value_type_block)->block;
+         struct vtn_block *new_loop_break = vtn_block(b, block->merge[1]);
+         struct vtn_block *new_loop_cont = vtn_block(b, block->merge[2]);
 
          /* Note: This recursive call will start with the current block as
           * its start block.  If we weren't careful, we would get here
@@ -542,8 +545,7 @@ vtn_cfg_walk_blocks(struct vtn_builder *b, struct list_head *cf_list,
 
       switch (*block->branch & SpvOpCodeMask) {
       case SpvOpBranch: {
-         struct vtn_block *branch_block =
-            vtn_value(b, block->branch[1], vtn_value_type_block)->block;
+         struct vtn_block *branch_block = vtn_block(b, block->branch[1]);
 
          block->branch_type = vtn_get_branch_type(b, branch_block,
                                                   switch_case, switch_break,
@@ -566,10 +568,8 @@ vtn_cfg_walk_blocks(struct vtn_builder *b, struct list_head *cf_list,
          return;
 
       case SpvOpBranchConditional: {
-         struct vtn_block *then_block =
-            vtn_value(b, block->branch[2], vtn_value_type_block)->block;
-         struct vtn_block *else_block =
-            vtn_value(b, block->branch[3], vtn_value_type_block)->block;
+         struct vtn_block *then_block = vtn_block(b, block->branch[2]);
+         struct vtn_block *else_block = vtn_block(b, block->branch[3]);
 
          struct vtn_if *if_stmt = ralloc(b, struct vtn_if);
 
@@ -606,8 +606,7 @@ vtn_cfg_walk_blocks(struct vtn_builder *b, struct list_head *cf_list,
                     if_stmt->else_type == vtn_branch_type_none) {
             /* Neither side of the if is something we can short-circuit. */
             vtn_assert((*block->merge & SpvOpCodeMask) == SpvOpSelectionMerge);
-            struct vtn_block *merge_block =
-               vtn_value(b, block->merge[1], vtn_value_type_block)->block;
+            struct vtn_block *merge_block = vtn_block(b, block->merge[1]);
 
             vtn_cfg_walk_blocks(b, &if_stmt->then_body, then_block,
                                 switch_case, switch_break,
@@ -647,8 +646,7 @@ vtn_cfg_walk_blocks(struct vtn_builder *b, struct list_head *cf_list,
 
       case SpvOpSwitch: {
          vtn_assert((*block->merge & SpvOpCodeMask) == SpvOpSelectionMerge);
-         struct vtn_block *break_block =
-            vtn_value(b, block->merge[1], vtn_value_type_block)->block;
+         struct vtn_block *break_block = vtn_block(b, block->merge[1]);
 
          struct vtn_switch *swtch = ralloc(b, struct vtn_switch);
 
@@ -707,8 +705,7 @@ vtn_cfg_walk_blocks(struct vtn_builder *b, struct list_head *cf_list,
           * them in fall-through order.
           */
          for (const uint32_t *w = block->branch + 2; w < branch_end;) {
-            struct vtn_block *case_block =
-               vtn_value(b, *w, vtn_value_type_block)->block;
+            struct vtn_block *case_block = vtn_block(b, *w);
 
             if (bitsize <= 32) {
                w += 2;
@@ -808,8 +805,7 @@ vtn_handle_phi_second_pass(struct vtn_builder *b, SpvOp opcode,
    nir_variable *phi_var = phi_entry->data;
 
    for (unsigned i = 3; i < count; i += 2) {
-      struct vtn_block *pred =
-         vtn_value(b, w[i + 1], vtn_value_type_block)->block;
+      struct vtn_block *pred = vtn_block(b, w[i + 1]);
 
       /* If block does not have end_nop, that is because it is an unreacheable
        * block, and hence it is not worth to handle it */



More information about the mesa-commit mailing list