[Mesa-dev] so the development model is working?
Alex Deucher
alexdeucher at gmail.com
Mon May 3 11:37:46 PDT 2010
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 2:26 PM, Zack Rusin <zackr at vmware.com> wrote:
> On Monday 03 May 2010 14:17:30 Alex Deucher wrote:
>> On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 2:09 PM, Brian Paul <brianp at vmware.com> wrote:
>> > I think it's worth exploring a policy of somehow tagging commits as
>> > candidates for back-porting to the stable branch so they can be some
>> > level of accounting and tracking. I don't think we need to work that out
>> > immediately though.
>>
>> On this point, it might be useful to update a cherry-pick wiki when
>> you do cherry-pick commits back to the stable branch. That way when
>> it comes time for the next stable point release, we can refer to the
>> list to update the release notes (or even link to the page from the
>> release notes for finer grained details). Thoughts?
>
> Would that actually gain us anything? I mean what would be the difference
> between that list and "git log last_stable_releast..current_stable_branch" ?
> I think what Brian meant was adding a magic tag to the commit message, e.g.
> "BACKPORT", or "FIX" which I could make the Mesa3D commit hook pick out from
> the commits and either create a bugzilla entry for that commit, email the
> author after some time, add that commit sha1 hash to some list or do some
> other random action. But as Brian mentioned this is something we don't have to
> figure out right away but see what would actually be useful as folks start
> cherry picking to the stable branch.
I guess it's just more of a manual variant of the same thing. Maybe
we can add a mesa-stable address and you can add a cc in the commit
like the kernel does.
Alex
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list