[Mesa-dev] [PATCH] ra: Add ra_set_node_reg() v2
Tom Stellard
tstellar at gmail.com
Mon Apr 25 19:48:37 PDT 2011
This function can be used to avoid creating single register classes for
input/payload registers. This makes optimistic coloring less likely
to fail.
v2: Added Eric Anholt's comment to the function.
---
src/mesa/program/register_allocate.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++---
src/mesa/program/register_allocate.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/mesa/program/register_allocate.c b/src/mesa/program/register_allocate.c
index 95a9bde..3c51abe 100644
--- a/src/mesa/program/register_allocate.c
+++ b/src/mesa/program/register_allocate.c
@@ -37,6 +37,8 @@
#include "main/mtypes.h"
#include "register_allocate.h"
+#define NO_REG ~0
+
struct ra_reg {
GLboolean *conflicts;
unsigned int *conflict_list;
@@ -227,7 +229,7 @@ ra_alloc_interference_graph(struct ra_regs *regs, unsigned int count)
g->nodes[i].adjacency_list = ralloc_array(g, unsigned int, count);
g->nodes[i].adjacency_count = 0;
ra_add_node_adjacency(g, i, i);
- g->nodes[i].reg = ~0;
+ g->nodes[i].reg = NO_REG;
}
return g;
@@ -287,7 +289,7 @@ ra_simplify(struct ra_graph *g)
progress = GL_FALSE;
for (i = g->count - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
- if (g->nodes[i].in_stack)
+ if (g->nodes[i].in_stack || g->nodes[i].reg != NO_REG)
continue;
if (pq_test(g, i)) {
@@ -367,7 +369,7 @@ ra_optimistic_color(struct ra_graph *g)
unsigned int i;
for (i = 0; i < g->count; i++) {
- if (g->nodes[i].in_stack)
+ if (g->nodes[i].in_stack || g->nodes[i].reg != NO_REG)
continue;
g->stack[g->stack_count] = i;
@@ -391,6 +393,24 @@ ra_get_node_reg(struct ra_graph *g, unsigned int n)
return g->nodes[n].reg;
}
+/**
+ * Forces a node to a specific register. This can be used to avoid
+ * creating a register class containing one node when handling data
+ * that must live in a fixed location and is known to not conflict
+ * with other forced register assignment (as is common with shader
+ * input data). These nodes do not end up in the stack during
+ * ra_simplify(), and thus at ra_select() time it is as if they were
+ * the first popped off the stack and assigned their fixed locations.
+ *
+ * Must be called before ra_simplify().
+ */
+void
+ra_set_node_reg(struct ra_graph *g, unsigned int n, unsigned int reg)
+{
+ g->nodes[n].reg = reg;
+ g->nodes[n].in_stack = GL_FALSE;
+}
+
static float
ra_get_spill_benefit(struct ra_graph *g, unsigned int n)
{
diff --git a/src/mesa/program/register_allocate.h b/src/mesa/program/register_allocate.h
index 198b89f..5b95833 100644
--- a/src/mesa/program/register_allocate.h
+++ b/src/mesa/program/register_allocate.h
@@ -65,6 +65,7 @@ GLboolean ra_select(struct ra_graph *g);
GLboolean ra_allocate_no_spills(struct ra_graph *g);
unsigned int ra_get_node_reg(struct ra_graph *g, unsigned int n);
+void ra_set_node_reg(struct ra_graph * g, unsigned int n, unsigned int reg);
void ra_set_node_spill_cost(struct ra_graph *g, unsigned int n, float cost);
int ra_get_best_spill_node(struct ra_graph *g);
/** @} */
--
1.7.3.4
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list