[Mesa-dev] [PATCH] configure.ac: Disable intel gallium drivers by default
keithw at vmware.com
Wed Feb 16 10:41:36 PST 2011
I certainly have no objection for i965... Dave and Jakob probably need
to comment also.
On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 13:35 -0500, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
> They're not maintained and gets in the way when loading EGL drivers.
> The doc string even says it's disabled by default.
> I think it makes sense to disable the intel gallium drivers as they're not
> maintained and not in use anywhere. If nothing else, they're certainly
> experimental, and as such it makes sense to require an opt-in before
> compiling them.
> Jakob didn't like the wholesale disabling of gallium for intel, but preferred
> a per-state tracker option (to disable gallium egl from loading intel
> gallium drivers, for example). I just don't think it makes sense to build
> the gallium intel drivers by default if they're not supposed to be
> used anywhere.
> configure.ac | 4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
> index 46d3516..4a3f06e 100644
> --- a/configure.ac
> +++ b/configure.ac
> @@ -1705,7 +1705,7 @@ AC_ARG_ENABLE([gallium-i915],
> [build gallium i915 @<:@default=disabled@:>@])],
> - [enable_gallium_i915=auto])
> + [enable_gallium_i915=no])
> if test "x$enable_gallium_i915" = xyes; then
> GALLIUM_WINSYS_DIRS="$GALLIUM_WINSYS_DIRS i915/sw"
> GALLIUM_DRIVERS_DIRS="$GALLIUM_DRIVERS_DIRS i915"
> @@ -1722,7 +1722,7 @@ AC_ARG_ENABLE([gallium-i965],
> [build gallium i965 @<:@default=disabled@:>@])],
> - [enable_gallium_i965=auto])
> + [enable_gallium_i965=no])
> if test "x$enable_gallium_i965" = xyes; then
> GALLIUM_DRIVERS_DIRS="$GALLIUM_DRIVERS_DIRS i965"
> gallium_check_st "i965/drm" "dri-i965" "xorg-i965"
More information about the mesa-dev