[Mesa-dev] Mesa (master): Squashed commit of the following:

Jose Fonseca jfonseca at vmware.com
Fri Jul 15 09:47:59 PDT 2011



----- Original Message -----
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On 07/14/2011 10:05 AM, Jose Fonseca wrote:
> > Module: Mesa
> > Branch: master
> > Commit: 9a7f84d6b28e180ef79349b36de9a5d58a1e2dc9
> > URL:
> >    http://cgit.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/commit/?id=9a7f84d6b28e180ef79349b36de9a5d58a1e2dc9
> > 
> > Author: José Fonseca <jfonseca at vmware.com>
> > Date:   Thu Jul 14 17:28:52 2011 +0100
> > 
> > Squashed commit of the following:
> > 
> > commit 1856230d9fa61710cce3e152b8d88b1269611a73
> > Author: José Fonseca <jose.r.fonseca at gmail.com>
> > Date:   Tue Jul 12 23:41:27 2011 +0100
> > 
> >     make: Use better var names on packaging.
> > 
> > commit d1ae72d0bd14e820ecfe9f8f27b316f9566ceb0c
> > Author: José Fonseca <jose.r.fonseca at gmail.com>
> > Date:   Tue Jul 12 23:38:21 2011 +0100
> > 
> >     make: Apply several of Dan Nicholson's suggestions.
> > 
> > commit f27cf8743ac9cbf4c0ad66aff0cd3f97efde97e4
> > Author: José Fonseca <jose.r.fonseca at gmail.com>
> > Date:   Sat Jul 9 14:18:20 2011 +0100
> > 
> >     make: Put back the tar.bz2 creation rule.
> > 
> >     Removed by accident.
> > 
> > commit 34983337f9d7db984e9f0117808274106d262110
> > Author: José Fonseca <jose.r.fonseca at gmail.com>
> > Date:   Sat Jul 9 11:59:29 2011 +0100
> > 
> >     make: Determine tarballs contents via git ls-files.
> > 
> >     The wildcards were a mess:
> >     - lots of files for non Linux platforms missing
> >     - several files listed and archived twice
> > 
> >     Using git-ls-files ensures things are not loss when making the
> >     tarballs.
> > 
> > commit 34a28ccbf459ed5710aafba5e7149e8291cb808c
> > Author: José Fonseca <jose.r.fonseca at gmail.com>
> > Date:   Sat Jul 9 11:07:14 2011 +0100
> > 
> >     glut: Remove GLUT source.
> > 
> >     Most distros ship freeglut, and most people don't care one vs
> >     the other,
> >     and it hasn't been really maintained.
> > 
> >     So it is better to have Mesa GLUT be revisioned and built
> >     separately
> >     from Mesa.
> > 
> > commit 5c26a2c3c0c7e95ef853e19d12d75c4f80137e7d
> > Author: José Fonseca <jose.r.fonseca at gmail.com>
> > Date:   Sat Jul 9 10:31:02 2011 +0100
> > 
> >     Ignore the tarballs.
> > 
> > commit 26edecac589819f0d0efe2165ab748dbc4e53394
> > Author: José Fonseca <jose.r.fonseca at gmail.com>
> > Date:   Sat Jul 9 10:30:24 2011 +0100
> > 
> >     make: Create the Mesa-xxx-devel symlink automatically.
> > 
> >     Also actually remote the intermediate uncompressed tarballs.
> 
> Is there some amount of this that could be cherry picked to the 7.11
> branch?  864eb84 (the follow-on commit) is an obvious candidate.

>  This
> probably explains some of the issues people had with the rc1
> tarballs.

You already had fixed in 7.11 branch, with your commit b033f050fd5179b051181a0a4b6d94110624d25c

Apart of this, the rest relies on dropping Mesa GLUT. I don't know if it is wise to drop it in a minor release...

Jose


More information about the mesa-dev mailing list