[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 04/13] glsl: When lowering non-constant array indexing, respect existing conditions

[Ian Romanick]

From: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick at intel.com>

If the non-constant index was in the LHS of an assignment, any
existing condititon on that assignment would be lost.

Fixes i965 piglit:

    fs-temp-array-mat[234]-col-row-wr
    fs-temp-array-mat[234]-index-col-row-wr
    fs-temp-array-mat[234]-index-col-wr
    fs-temp-array-mat[234]-index-row-wr
    vs-varying-array-mat[234]-index-col-wr
---
 src/glsl/lower_variable_index_to_cond_assign.cpp |   21 ++++++++++++++++++---
 1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/glsl/lower_variable_index_to_cond_assign.cpp b/src/glsl/lower_variable_index_to_cond_assign.cpp
index 107bcc6..e08ec13 100644
--- a/src/glsl/lower_variable_index_to_cond_assign.cpp
+++ b/src/glsl/lower_variable_index_to_cond_assign.cpp
@@ -417,9 +417,24 @@ public:
 
       switch_generator sg(ag, index, 4, 4);
 
-      exec_list list;
-      sg.generate(0, length, &list);
-      base_ir->insert_before(&list);
+      /* If the original assignment has a condition, respect that original
+       * condition!  This is acomplished by wrapping the new conditional
+       * assignments in an if-statement that uses the original condition.
+       */
+      if ((orig_assign != NULL) && (orig_assign->condition != NULL)) {
+	 /* No need to clone the condition because the IR that it hangs on is
+	  * going to be removed from the instruction sequence.
+	  */
+	 ir_if *if_stmt = new(mem_ctx) ir_if(orig_assign->condition);
+
+	 sg.generate(0, length, &if_stmt->then_instructions);
+	 base_ir->insert_before(if_stmt);
+      } else {
+	 exec_list list;
+
+	 sg.generate(0, length, &list);
+	 base_ir->insert_before(&list);
+      }
 
       return var;
    }
-- 
1.7.4.4