[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 0/3] Only require libdrm if direct rendering is actually enabled

[Brian Paul]

On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Jon TURNEY <jon.turney at dronecode.org.uk> wrote:
> On 16/02/2011 15:44, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 15:11:34 +0000, Jon TURNEY wrote:
>>
>>> At the moment, libGL cannot be built --with-driver=dri --disable-driglx-direct
>>> on platforms which don't have libdrm.
>>>
>>> --with-driver=dri is the only way to build a libGL which supports indirect
>>> rendering.
>>>
>>> This patch set makes libdrm only required if --enable-driglx-direct is used,
>>> and makes --disable-driglx-direct the default on cygwin and hurd.
>>>
>>> (this patch set combines patches from fd.o bugs #27840 and #29460, updated for
>>> the current git master)
>>>
>>> Jon TURNEY (1):
>>>   Disable direct rendering on Cygwin
>>>
>>> Samuel Thibault (1):
>>>   Only require libdrm if direct rendering is actually enabled.
>>>
>>> nobled (1):
>>>   Disable direct rendering on GNU/Hurd
>>>
>> For the series:
>> Reviewed-by: Julien Cristau <jcristau at debian.org>
>
> Thanks, updated patches with tag added to follow.
>
> Can I apply for mesa commit access, since no-one seems to be particularly
> interested in picking up my patches?

Sure, there's instructions on the website.

I'll commit these tomorrow if there's no objection.  They look OK to
me but I'm not an autoconf expert.

-Brian