[Mesa-dev] [PATCH] intel: Assert that no batch is emitted if a region is mapped [v2]
Ian Romanick
idr at freedesktop.org
Tue Oct 11 13:59:21 PDT 2011
On 10/10/2011 01:22 PM, Chad Versace wrote:
> What I would prefer to assert is that, for each region that is currently
> mapped, no batch is emitted that uses that region's bo. However, it's much
> easier to implement this big hammer.
>
> Observe that this requires that the batch flush in intel_region_map() be
> moved to within the map_refcount guard.
>
> v2: Add comments (borrowed from anholt's reply) explaining why the
> assertion is a good idea.
>
> CC: Eric Anholt<eric at anholt.net>
Reviewed-by: Ian Romanick<ian.d.romanick at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chad Versace<chad at chad-versace.us>
> ---
> src/mesa/drivers/dri/intel/intel_batchbuffer.c | 7 +++++++
> src/mesa/drivers/dri/intel/intel_context.h | 8 ++++++++
> src/mesa/drivers/dri/intel/intel_regions.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
> 3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/intel/intel_batchbuffer.c b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/intel/intel_batchbuffer.c
> index 37c13c9..8dfae677 100644
> --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/intel/intel_batchbuffer.c
> +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/intel/intel_batchbuffer.c
> @@ -148,6 +148,13 @@ void
> _intel_batchbuffer_flush(struct intel_context *intel,
> const char *file, int line)
> {
> + /* No batch should be emitted that uses a mapped region, because that would
> + * cause the map to be incoherent with GPU rendering done by the
> + * batchbuffer. To ensure that condition, we assert a condition that is
> + * stronger but easier to implement: that *no* region is mapped.
> + */
> + assert(intel->num_mapped_regions == 0);
> +
> if (intel->batch.used == 0)
> return;
>
> diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/intel/intel_context.h b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/intel/intel_context.h
> index eb78c00..f3d0bcc 100644
> --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/intel/intel_context.h
> +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/intel/intel_context.h
> @@ -287,6 +287,14 @@ struct intel_context
> */
> GLboolean is_front_buffer_reading;
>
> + /**
> + * Count of intel_regions that are mapped.
> + *
> + * This allows us to assert that no batch buffer is emitted if a
> + * region is mapped.
> + */
> + int num_mapped_regions;
> +
> GLboolean use_texture_tiling;
> GLboolean use_early_z;
>
> diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/intel/intel_regions.c b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/intel/intel_regions.c
> index 7faf4ca..67142a1 100644
> --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/intel/intel_regions.c
> +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/intel/intel_regions.c
> @@ -111,15 +111,28 @@ debug_backtrace(void)
> GLubyte *
> intel_region_map(struct intel_context *intel, struct intel_region *region)
> {
> - intel_flush(&intel->ctx);
> + /* We have the region->map_refcount controlling mapping of the BO because
> + * in software fallbacks we may end up mapping the same buffer multiple
> + * times on Mesa's behalf, so we refcount our mappings to make sure that
> + * the pointer stays valid until the end of the unmap chain. However, we
> + * must not emit any batchbuffers between the start of mapping and the end
> + * of unmapping, or further use of the map will be incoherent with the GPU
> + * rendering done by that batchbuffer. Hence we assert in
> + * intel_batchbuffer_flush() that that doesn't happen, which means that the
> + * flush is only needed on first map of the buffer.
> + */
>
> _DBG("%s %p\n", __FUNCTION__, region);
> if (!region->map_refcount++) {
> + intel_flush(&intel->ctx);
> +
> if (region->tiling != I915_TILING_NONE)
> drm_intel_gem_bo_map_gtt(region->bo);
> else
> drm_intel_bo_map(region->bo, GL_TRUE);
> +
> region->map = region->bo->virtual;
> + ++intel->num_mapped_regions;
> }
>
> return region->map;
> @@ -134,7 +147,10 @@ intel_region_unmap(struct intel_context *intel, struct intel_region *region)
> drm_intel_gem_bo_unmap_gtt(region->bo);
> else
> drm_intel_bo_unmap(region->bo);
> +
> region->map = NULL;
> + --intel->num_mapped_regions;
> + assert(intel->num_mapped_regions>= 0);
> }
> }
>
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list