[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 3/9] st/mesa: make user index buffers optional

Jose Fonseca jfonseca at vmware.com
Thu Apr 26 11:54:48 PDT 2012


----- Original Message -----
> ---
>  src/mesa/state_tracker/st_context.c    |    4 +++-
>  src/mesa/state_tracker/st_context.h    |    1 +
>  src/mesa/state_tracker/st_draw.c       |    5 +++++
>  src/mesa/state_tracker/st_extensions.c |    4 ++++
>  4 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/src/mesa/state_tracker/st_context.c
> b/src/mesa/state_tracker/st_context.c
> index 84aae81..164cc45 100644
> --- a/src/mesa/state_tracker/st_context.c
> +++ b/src/mesa/state_tracker/st_context.c
> @@ -155,7 +155,9 @@ st_create_context_priv( struct gl_context *ctx,
> struct pipe_context *pipe )
>     st->dirty.mesa = ~0;
>     st->dirty.st = ~0;
>  
> -   st->uploader = u_upload_create(st->pipe, 65536, 4,
> PIPE_BIND_VERTEX_BUFFER);
> +   st->uploader = u_upload_create(st->pipe, 128 * 1024, 4,
> +                                  PIPE_BIND_VERTEX_BUFFER |
> +                                  PIPE_BIND_INDEX_BUFFER);

Marek,

Instead of lumping this into the same hardware buffer, I think it would be better to use two separate uploaders so that the driver can effectively do optimization based on PIPE_BIND_VERTEX_BUFFER or PIPE_BIND_INDEX_BUFFER.  A quick look on current drivers showed that they do look at these bind flags.

Otherwise I don't see anything wrong with this series. It seems a nice cleanup/speedup.

Brian's OOTO till Monday, so allow more time for him to comment.

Also, once you updated the series, please provide it in a clonable git branch for testing.

Jose


More information about the mesa-dev mailing list