[Mesa-dev] i965: Fixing dirty bits

[Eric Anholt]

On Sun,  8 Jan 2012 14:43:49 -0800, Kenneth Graunke <kenneth at whitecape.org> wrote:
> While investigating an etracer issue on Ivybridge, I did a lot of careful
> reading of the tracked state atoms' dirty bits.  Found a bunch of issues.
> Unfortunately, none of these patches fixed the issues I was seeing.
> 
> While we're at it: BRW_NEW_CONTEXT seems like the wrong thing in basically
> every case.  Until we get MI_SET_CONTEXT, we always want to use NEW_BATCH.
> Or am I missing something?  I mean, NEW_CONTEXT won't hurt, but seems
> superfluous.

1, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11 are Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <eric at anholt.net>

> I'm also uncertain whether things like gen6_cc need to listen to
> BRW_NEW_STATE_BASE_ADDRESS or not.

It might be more clear, but it's just NEW_BATCH anyway.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/attachments/20120109/cad0a536/attachment.pgp>