[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 10/17] glapi: Annotate XML with function name suffix anomalies.

[Eric Anholt]

Kenneth Graunke <kenneth at whitecape.org> writes:

> On 11/02/2012 05:13 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
>> On 11/02/2012 03:01 PM, Paul Berry wrote:
>>> On 2 November 2012 14:11, Ian Romanick <idr at freedesktop.org
>>>     Oh yuck!  Why not just fix the names of the Mesa functions?  That
>>>     seems much better than carrying the work-around in the code
>>>     generator forever.
>>>
>>>
>>> The reason I shied away from this approach is that there are a lot of
>>> functions to fix (146 of them by my count), and I was worried it would
>>> take a very long time to rename all references to them.
>>
>> That many?  Ugh.  Is it possible to switch the aliasing order?  For the
>> IsProgram case, IsProgramNV would alias IsProgramARB (instead of the
>> other way around).  Is that better or worse?
>>
>>> But I didn't actually try it.  I'll try spending a few hours on it and
>>> see how far I get.
>
> FWIW, I would like to see Mesa use the core names.  IsProgramNV is 
> particularly odd because we don't support the extension it came 
> from...the name IsProgramARB makes a lot more sense.

Seconding this.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/attachments/20121104/e7879a86/attachment.pgp>