[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 2/2] llvmpipe: Improve color buffer loads/stores alignment.

Jose Fonseca jfonseca at vmware.com
Fri Nov 30 10:51:39 PST 2012



----- Original Message -----
> Am 30.11.2012 18:43, schrieb jfonseca at vmware.com:
> > From: José Fonseca <jfonseca at vmware.com>
> > 
> > Tell LLVM the exact alignment we can guarantee, based on the fs
> > block
> > dimensions, pixel format, and the alignment of the resource base
> > pointer
> > and stride.
> > ---
> >  src/gallium/drivers/llvmpipe/lp_state_fs.c |   31
> >  +++++++++++++++++++---------
> >  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/src/gallium/drivers/llvmpipe/lp_state_fs.c
> > b/src/gallium/drivers/llvmpipe/lp_state_fs.c
> > index 2d2e346..6819d33 100644
> > --- a/src/gallium/drivers/llvmpipe/lp_state_fs.c
> > +++ b/src/gallium/drivers/llvmpipe/lp_state_fs.c
> > @@ -839,7 +839,8 @@ load_unswizzled_block(struct gallivm_state
> > *gallivm,
> >                        unsigned block_height,
> >                        LLVMValueRef* dst,
> >                        struct lp_type dst_type,
> > -                      unsigned dst_count)
> > +                      unsigned dst_count,
> > +                      unsigned dst_alignment)
> >  {
> >     LLVMBuilderRef builder = gallivm->builder;
> >     unsigned row_size = dst_count / block_height;
> > @@ -866,9 +867,7 @@ load_unswizzled_block(struct gallivm_state
> > *gallivm,
> >  
> >        dst[i] = LLVMBuildLoad(builder, dst_ptr, "");
> >  
> > -      if ((dst_type.length % 3) == 0) {
> > -         lp_set_load_alignment(dst[i], dst_type.width / 8);
> > -      }
> > +      lp_set_load_alignment(dst[i], dst_alignment);
> >     }
> >  }
> >  
> > @@ -884,7 +883,8 @@ store_unswizzled_block(struct gallivm_state
> > *gallivm,
> >                         unsigned block_height,
> >                         LLVMValueRef* src,
> >                         struct lp_type src_type,
> > -                       unsigned src_count)
> > +                       unsigned src_count,
> > +                       unsigned src_alignment)
> >  {
> >     LLVMBuilderRef builder = gallivm->builder;
> >     unsigned row_size = src_count / block_height;
> > @@ -893,6 +893,8 @@ store_unswizzled_block(struct gallivm_state
> > *gallivm,
> >     /* Ensure src exactly fits into block */
> >     assert((block_width * block_height) % src_count == 0);
> >  
> > +
> > +
> extra whitespace.
> 
> >     for (i = 0; i < src_count; ++i) {
> >        unsigned x = i % row_size;
> >        unsigned y = i / row_size;
> > @@ -911,9 +913,7 @@ store_unswizzled_block(struct gallivm_state
> > *gallivm,
> >  
> >        src_ptr = LLVMBuildStore(builder, src[i], src_ptr);
> >  
> > -      if ((src_type.length % 3) == 0) {
> > -         lp_set_store_alignment(src_ptr, src_type.width / 8);
> > -      }
> > +      lp_set_store_alignment(src_ptr, src_alignment);
> >     }
> >  }
> >  
> > @@ -1333,6 +1333,8 @@ generate_unswizzled_blend(struct
> > gallivm_state *gallivm,
> >  
> >     const struct util_format_description* out_format_desc =
> >     util_format_description(out_format);
> >  
> > +   unsigned dst_alignment;
> > +
> >     bool pad_inline = is_arithmetic_format(out_format_desc);
> >     bool has_alpha = false;
> >  
> > @@ -1340,6 +1342,13 @@ generate_unswizzled_blend(struct
> > gallivm_state *gallivm,
> >     mask_type = lp_int32_vec4_type();
> >     mask_type.length = fs_type.length;
> >  
> > +   /* Compute the alignment of the destination pointer in bytes */
> > +   dst_alignment = (block_width * out_format_desc->block.bits +
> > 7)/(out_format_desc->block.width * 8);
> > +   /* Force power-of-two alignment by extracting only the
> > least-significant-bit */
> > +   dst_alignment = 1 << (ffs(dst_alignment) - 1);
> > +   /* Resource base and stride pointers are aligned to 16 bytes,
> > so that's the maximum alignment we can guarantee */
> > +   dst_alignment = MIN2(dst_alignment, 16);
> I wonder if this is all necessary. block_width is a constant and pot,
> and the formats are all pot-sized too, 

Formats are not necessarily pot-sized: R8G8B8, R16G16B16, etc.

For example, for R8G8B8, 4*3 = 12 bytes. So if we need to round this down to 4 bytes.

> so trying to align this to pot
> won't really do much.
> So unless this somehow should handle non-pot block_width (and I don't
> think this makes sense) this should probably be simplified.
> 
> > +
> >     /* Do not bother executing code when mask is empty.. */
> >     if (do_branch) {
> >        check_mask = LLVMConstNull(lp_build_int_vec_type(gallivm,
> >        mask_type));
> > @@ -1616,7 +1625,8 @@ generate_unswizzled_blend(struct
> > gallivm_state *gallivm,
> >  
> >     dst_type.length *= 16 / dst_count;
> >  
> > -   load_unswizzled_block(gallivm, color_ptr, stride, block_width,
> > block_height, dst, dst_type, dst_count);
> > +   load_unswizzled_block(gallivm, color_ptr, stride, block_width,
> > block_height,
> > +                         dst, dst_type, dst_count, dst_alignment);
> >  
> >  
> >     /*
> > @@ -1681,7 +1691,8 @@ generate_unswizzled_blend(struct
> > gallivm_state *gallivm,
> >     /*
> >      * Store blend result to memory
> >      */
> > -   store_unswizzled_block(gallivm, color_ptr, stride, block_width,
> > block_height, dst, dst_type, dst_count);
> > +   store_unswizzled_block(gallivm, color_ptr, stride, block_width,
> > block_height,
> > +                          dst, dst_type, dst_count,
> > dst_alignment);
> >  
> >     if (do_branch) {
> >        lp_build_mask_end(&mask_ctx);
> > 
> 
> Otherwise, this (and rest of series) looks good to me.
> 

Thanks for the review.

Jose


More information about the mesa-dev mailing list