[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 1/2] Revert "i965: Implement guardband clipping on Sandybridge."
oliver.mcfadden at linux.intel.com
Wed Oct 3 02:34:12 PDT 2012
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 11:37:33AM +0300, Oliver McFadden wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 06:47:49PM -0700, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
> > On 10/02/2012 04:00 AM, Oliver McFadden wrote:
> > > This reverts commit 85cd30406ff8414bc6ac6de1064d059a4c564160.
> > >
> > > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55523
> > > Signed-off-by: Oliver McFadden <oliver.mcfadden at linux.intel.com>
> > > CC: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth at whitecape.org>
> > > ---
> > > src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/gen6_clip_state.c | 1 -
> > > src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/gen6_viewport_state.c | 24 +++++++++-------------
> > > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> > Oliver,
> > I'm fine with reverting these patches on the 9.0 branch...especially
> > given how close we are to a release. I'd like to leave them on master
> > for a little while and do some investigation. If we can't solve it, we
> > can revert it...but if it ends up being something easy, I'd rather just
> > fix it...
> Okay. I am unfamiliar with the process for applying patches onto the
> release branches... May I simply push the revert patches there, with
> your Reviewed-by (which I assume you have given implicitly,) or must I
> involve Brian?
I'm going to CC Brian into this discussion because these revert patches
really should be applied to both the 8.0 and 9.0 branches. Ideally
before 9.0 is released, and before the next 8.x release.
7.11 branch is safe because it's before the introduction of these two
Ken, may I add your Reviewed-by for these reverts as applied to the
stable branches? I will wait before pushing to the master branch in
case you're able to come up with a solution for the guard-band clipping.
More information about the mesa-dev