[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 10/10] i965/fs: Improve performance of copy/constant propagation.
Eric Anholt
eric at anholt.net
Mon Oct 8 08:49:14 PDT 2012
Kenneth Graunke <kenneth at whitecape.org> writes:
> On 09/22/2012 02:04 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
>> Use a simple chaining hash table for the ACP. This is not really very good,
>> because we still do a full walk of the tree per destination write, but it
>> still reduces fp-long-alu runtime from 5.3 to 3.9s.
>> ---
>> src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs.h | 2 +-
>> .../drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs_copy_propagation.cpp | 46 +++++++++++++-------
>> 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs.h b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs.h
>> index 59a0e50..3ea4e00 100644
>> --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs.h
>> +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs.h
>> @@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ public:
>> bool try_copy_propagate(fs_inst *inst, int arg, acp_entry *entry);
>> bool try_constant_propagate(fs_inst *inst, acp_entry *entry);
>> bool opt_copy_propagate_local(void *mem_ctx, fs_bblock *block,
>> - exec_list *acp);
>> + exec_list *acp, int acp_count);
>> bool register_coalesce();
>> bool register_coalesce_2();
>> bool compute_to_mrf();
>> diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs_copy_propagation.cpp b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs_copy_propagation.cpp
>> index ad34657..0f6dbd4 100644
>> --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs_copy_propagation.cpp
>> +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs_copy_propagation.cpp
>> @@ -196,7 +196,8 @@ fs_visitor::try_constant_propagate(fs_inst *inst, acp_entry *entry)
>> */
>> bool
>> fs_visitor::opt_copy_propagate_local(void *mem_ctx,
>> - fs_bblock *block, exec_list *acp)
>> + fs_bblock *block, exec_list *acp,
>> + int acp_count)
>> {
>> bool progress = false;
>>
>> @@ -205,28 +206,41 @@ fs_visitor::opt_copy_propagate_local(void *mem_ctx,
>> inst = (fs_inst *)inst->next) {
>>
>> /* Try propagating into this instruction. */
>> - foreach_list(entry_node, acp) {
>> - acp_entry *entry = (acp_entry *)entry_node;
>> + for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
>> + if (inst->src[i].file != GRF)
>> + continue;
>>
>> - if (try_constant_propagate(inst, entry))
>> - progress = true;
>> + foreach_list(entry_node, &acp[inst->src[i].reg % acp_count]) {
>> + acp_entry *entry = (acp_entry *)entry_node;
>>
>> - for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
>> - if (try_copy_propagate(inst, i, entry))
>> - progress = true;
>> - }
>> + if (try_constant_propagate(inst, entry))
>> + progress = true;
>> +
>> + if (try_copy_propagate(inst, i, entry))
>> + progress = true;
>> + }
>> }
>>
>> /* kill the destination from the ACP */
>> if (inst->dst.file == GRF) {
>> - foreach_list_safe(entry_node, acp) {
>> + foreach_list_safe(entry_node, &acp[inst->dst.reg % acp_count]) {
>> acp_entry *entry = (acp_entry *)entry_node;
>>
>> - if (inst->overwrites_reg(entry->dst) ||
>> - inst->overwrites_reg(entry->src)) {
>> + if (inst->overwrites_reg(entry->dst)) {
>> entry->remove();
>> }
>> }
>> +
>> + /* Oops, we only have the chaining hash based on the destination, not
>> + * the source, so walk across the entire table.
>> + */
>> + for (int i = 0; i < acp_count; i++) {
>> + foreach_list_safe(entry_node, &acp[i]) {
>> + acp_entry *entry = (acp_entry *)entry_node;
>> + if (inst->overwrites_reg(entry->src))
>> + entry->remove();
>> + }
>> + }
>> }
>>
>> /* If this instruction is a raw copy, add it to the ACP. */
>> @@ -246,7 +260,7 @@ fs_visitor::opt_copy_propagate_local(void *mem_ctx,
>> acp_entry *entry = ralloc(mem_ctx, acp_entry);
>> entry->dst = inst->dst;
>> entry->src = inst->src[0];
>> - acp->push_tail(entry);
>> + acp[entry->dst.reg % acp_count].push_tail(entry);
>> }
>> }
>>
>> @@ -263,9 +277,11 @@ fs_visitor::opt_copy_propagate()
>>
>> for (int b = 0; b < cfg.num_blocks; b++) {
>> fs_bblock *block = cfg.blocks[b];
>> - exec_list acp;
>> + int acp_count = 16;
>> + exec_list acp[acp_count];
>
> I still think it might be worth moving these declarations into
> opt_copy_propagate_local() rather than in the loop here.
Yeah, that was prep for doing propagation across block boundaries, but
it's the wrong interface for that anyway, so I've moved them in.
> I'd also make acp_count const. For one, it better not change. Also,
> making it const may help the compiler determine the size of the array
> statically, at compile time. It should anyway, but. Never hurts.
Const doesn't let the compiler do anything different. I wish that meme
would die.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/attachments/20121008/7f5458f9/attachment.pgp>
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list