[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 2/2] intel: add ANGLE_texture_compression_dxt extension support.
Brian Paul
brianp at vmware.com
Tue Sep 4 11:41:12 PDT 2012
On 09/04/2012 12:08 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
> On 09/04/2012 08:16 AM, Brian Paul wrote:
>> Most of the patch is 'FEATURE_x' changes. I've been tempted to rip out
>> all that stuff.
>>
>> The original idea was to make it easy for people to build smaller Mesa
>> subsets (and the ES subset) by running the code through the
>> preprocessor
>> with all the FEATURE_x flags set on/off as needed. In the past some
>> people were really concerned about code size for static analysis and to
>> minimize binary sizes. I haven't heard any concerns about that in a
>> long time. If someone's really determined to make a tighter subset,
>> they'd have to go above and beyond turning off FEATURE_x flags anyway.
>>
>> And now, we're building one library that supports runtime selection of
>> full OpenGL profiles, core profiles and ES profiles. The FEATURE stuff
>> doesn't add any value for that and seems more trouble than it's worth.
>>
>> Any other opinions?
>
> I'm not a fan of the fine-grained FEATURE_x bits. If we had just a
> couple (like FEATURE_ES2) that were actually maintained, I could see
> the potential for value. As it is, I think it just adds maintenance
> burden.
OK. Any volunteers to start removing the FEATURE_x lines?
-Brian
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list