[Mesa-dev] [PATCH] build: Disable building of d3d1x

Matt Turner mattst88 at gmail.com
Fri Sep 7 08:17:15 PDT 2012


On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 7:55 AM, Christoph Bumiller
<e0425955 at student.tuwien.ac.at> wrote:
> On 07.09.2012 12:30, Jose Fonseca wrote:
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Jose Fonseca <jfonseca at vmware.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> Matt,
>>>>
>>>> I see you went ahead and just disabled it. Please remove it all
>>>> together.
>>>>
>>>> Touching code that is not built nor tested ends just silently
>>>> introduces bugs, so keeping this around won't help bring it back
>>>> one day in any way.
>>>>
>>>> Jose
>>>
>>> I talked with both Marek and Christoph, and they both said they'd
>>> prefer to simply disable the build. I don't feel strongly, but if
>>> someone is to revive it it'd be nice if we didn't make the git
>>> history
>>> harder to follow.
>>
>> I suppose they have their arguments, and I hope they include making this build again shortly.  What I don't understand is why these talks didn't happen within this email thread. I'd expect at least a heads up email before committing this...
>>
>
> Actually I didn't express any preference. I can't say when or even if
> I'll work on d3d1x again, and I don't care about making it build in the
> meantime, since it isn't useful for anyone without further improvements.
>
> (Like working translation of SM4 to TGSI; my passing SM4 to the driver
> directly works much better right now, but is too "evil" to push upstream).

Oh, that's not how it seemed on IRC.

[13:11] <    mattst88> | calim, mareko: what do you think about
disabling the d3d1x build vs just removing d3d1x?

[13:28] <      calim> | mattst88: yeah disable it, I don't have time
to work on it and therefore I don't have the nerve to care about
whether it builds or not


More information about the mesa-dev mailing list