[Mesa-dev] new i965g pipe driver for Intel GEN6 (and later)
Chia-I Wu
olvaffe at gmail.com
Tue Apr 16 13:11:30 PDT 2013
Hi Ken,
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 1:18 AM, Kenneth Graunke <kenneth at whitecape.org>wrote:
> On 04/16/2013 09:58 AM, Matt Turner wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 9:45 AM, Chia-I Wu <olvaffe at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> If there is no objection, I'd like to merge it in a day or two.
>>>
>>
>> My only objection is over adding a driver that is explicitly a toy,
>> the confusion it will cause users, and the developer time it will
>> waste. It wasn't uncommon for a user to waste a nontrivial amount of
>> someone's time in #intel-gfx only to discover that they were trying to
>> use the (old) i965g driver that no one maintained.
>>
>
> That's very true.
>
> I wonder, should i965g be built by default? Or should you have to
> explicitly request it via --with-gallium-drivers=i965? The thinking is
> that the default should be to build the drivers most people want to use.
>
> We could also make ./configure print out a warning message saying
> something like: "The Gallium i965 driver is highly experimental and not
> supported by Intel. Intel recommends using the classic driver
> (--with-dri-drivers=i965)."
>
> Those are just ideas. I'm open to discussion.
The driver is disabled by default and needs to be enabled via
--with-gallium-drivers=i965.
I explained why I want the driver merged in my reply to Matt. It looks
like the other concern for your team is that the new driver could be
confusing. I can imagine that. I wonder if it can be resolved
technically. Maybe the same rule can be applied to i915g, if you still get
bug reports for it.
>
>
> I think everything Marek said was correct. If you could extend Gallium
>> to consume GLSL IR it might actually be an interesting project.
>>
>
> I agree, that would be interesting. It'd definitely make for a more
> compelling classic vs. gallium comparison.
>
> --Ken
>
--
olv at LunarG.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/attachments/20130417/48e19970/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list