[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 3/3] r600g: Don't set the dest cache bits on surface sync for R600_CONTEXT_FLUSH_AND_INV

Tom Stellard tom at stellard.net
Fri Apr 26 10:21:06 PDT 2013


From: Tom Stellard <thomas.stellard at amd.com>

We are already emitting a EVENT_TYPE_CACHE_FLUSH_AND_INV_EVENT packet
when this flush flag is set, so flushing the dest caches with a
SURFACE_SYNC should not be necessary.

The motivation for this change is that emitting a SURFACE_SYNC packet with
the CB bits set was causing compute shaders to hang on Cayman.
---
 src/gallium/drivers/r600/r600_hw_context.c | 28 +++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/gallium/drivers/r600/r600_hw_context.c b/src/gallium/drivers/r600/r600_hw_context.c
index b4fb3bf..8aebd25 100644
--- a/src/gallium/drivers/r600/r600_hw_context.c
+++ b/src/gallium/drivers/r600/r600_hw_context.c
@@ -231,21 +231,19 @@ void r600_flush_emit(struct r600_context *rctx)
 		cs->buf[cs->cdw++] = PKT3(PKT3_EVENT_WRITE, 0, 0);
 		cs->buf[cs->cdw++] = EVENT_TYPE(EVENT_TYPE_CACHE_FLUSH_AND_INV_EVENT) | EVENT_INDEX(0);
 		if (rctx->chip_class >= EVERGREEN) {
-			cp_coher_cntl = S_0085F0_CB0_DEST_BASE_ENA(1) |
-					S_0085F0_CB1_DEST_BASE_ENA(1) |
-					S_0085F0_CB2_DEST_BASE_ENA(1) |
-					S_0085F0_CB3_DEST_BASE_ENA(1) |
-					S_0085F0_CB4_DEST_BASE_ENA(1) |
-					S_0085F0_CB5_DEST_BASE_ENA(1) |
-					S_0085F0_CB6_DEST_BASE_ENA(1) |
-					S_0085F0_CB7_DEST_BASE_ENA(1) |
-					S_0085F0_CB8_DEST_BASE_ENA(1) |
-					S_0085F0_CB9_DEST_BASE_ENA(1) |
-					S_0085F0_CB10_DEST_BASE_ENA(1) |
-					S_0085F0_CB11_DEST_BASE_ENA(1) |
-					S_0085F0_DB_DEST_BASE_ENA(1) |
-					S_0085F0_TC_ACTION_ENA(1) |
-					S_0085F0_CB_ACTION_ENA(1) |
+			/* We were previously setting the CB and DB bits on
+			 * cp_coher_cntl, but this is unnecessary since
+			 * we are emitting the
+			 * EVENT_TYPE_CACHE_FLUSH_AND_INV_EVENT packet.
+			 * Setting the CB bits was causing lockups when using
+			 * compute on cayman.
+			 *
+			 * XXX: Do even need to emit a surface sync packet here?
+			 * Prior to e5e4c07e7964a3258ed02b530bcdc24c0650204b
+			 * surface sync was not being emitted with the
+			 * R600_CONTEXT_FLUSH_AND_INV flag.
+			 */
+			cp_coher_cntl =	S_0085F0_TC_ACTION_ENA(1) |
 					S_0085F0_DB_ACTION_ENA(1) |
 					S_0085F0_SH_ACTION_ENA(1) |
 					S_0085F0_SMX_ACTION_ENA(1) |
-- 
1.8.1.5



More information about the mesa-dev mailing list