[Mesa-dev] [RFC PATCH 09/10] i965/clip: Use clip distances for all user clipping
Chris Forbes
chrisf at ijw.co.nz
Mon Aug 5 14:47:44 PDT 2013
This is what I started with, but brw_ENDIF destroys the flags.
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Paul Berry <stereotype441 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 3 August 2013 19:59, Chris Forbes <chrisf at ijw.co.nz> wrote:
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chris Forbes <chrisf at ijw.co.nz>
>> ---
>> src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_clip_tri.c | 7 +++++--
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_clip_tri.c
>> b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_clip_tri.c
>> index bd3ffb3..4d2eb0a 100644
>> --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_clip_tri.c
>> +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_clip_tri.c
>> @@ -241,16 +241,19 @@ load_clip_distance(struct brw_clip_compile *c,
>> struct brw_indirect vtx,
>> brw_AND(p, vec1(brw_null_reg()), c->reg.vertex_src_mask,
>> brw_imm_ud(1));
>> brw_IF(p, BRW_EXECUTE_1);
>> {
>> - brw_MOV(p, dst, deref_4f(vtx, clip_offset));
>> + struct brw_indirect temp_ptr = brw_indirect(7, 0);
>> + brw_ADD(p, get_addr_reg(temp_ptr), get_addr_reg(vtx),
>> c->reg.clipdistance_offset);
>> + brw_MOV(p, vec1(dst), deref_1f(temp_ptr, 0));
>> }
>> brw_ELSE(p);
>> {
>> brw_MOV(p, dst, deref_4f(vtx, hpos_offset));
>> + brw_DP4(p, dst, dst, c->reg.plane_equation);
>> }
>> brw_ENDIF(p);
>>
>> brw_set_conditionalmod(p, cond);
>> - brw_DP4(p, dst, dst, c->reg.plane_equation);
>> + brw_CMP(p, brw_null_reg(), cond, vec1(dst), brw_imm_f(0.0f));
>> }
>
>
> I think you can use one less instruction if you do this instead:
>
> brw_IF(p, BRW_EXECUTE_1);
> {
>
> struct brw_indirect temp_ptr = brw_indirect(7, 0);
> brw_ADD(p, get_addr_reg(temp_ptr), get_addr_reg(vtx),
> c->reg.clipdistance_offset);
> brw_set_conditionalmod(p, cond);
>
> brw_MOV(p, vec1(dst), deref_1f(temp_ptr, 0));
> }
> brw_ELSE(p);
> {
> brw_MOV(p, dst, deref_4f(vtx, hpos_offset));
> brw_set_conditionalmod(p, cond);
>
> brw_DP4(p, dst, dst, c->reg.plane_equation);
> }
> brw_ENDIF(p);
>
> But I haven't tried it so it's possible that it doesn't work for some
> non-obvious reason :)
>
> In any case, this patch is:
>
> Reviewed-by: Paul Berry <stereotype441 at gmail.com>
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list