[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 14/25] i965: Update brw_instruction_name() with some recently added opcodes.

[Francisco Jerez]

---
 src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_shader.cpp | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)

diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_shader.cpp b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_shader.cpp
index 26300a6..dc6d35e 100644
--- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_shader.cpp
+++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_shader.cpp
@@ -527,6 +527,26 @@ brw_instruction_name(enum opcode op)
    case GS_OPCODE_SET_CHANNEL_MASKS:
       return "set_channel_masks";
 
+   case SHADER_OPCODE_SHADER_TIME_ADD:
+      return "shader_time_add";
+
+   case SHADER_OPCODE_UNTYPED_ATOMIC:
+      return "untyped_atomic";
+   case SHADER_OPCODE_UNTYPED_SURFACE_READ:
+      return "untyped_surface_read";
+   case SHADER_OPCODE_UNTYPED_SURFACE_WRITE:
+      return "untyped_surface_write";
+
+   case SHADER_OPCODE_TYPED_ATOMIC:
+      return "typed_atomic";
+   case SHADER_OPCODE_TYPED_SURFACE_READ:
+      return "typed_surface_read";
+   case SHADER_OPCODE_TYPED_SURFACE_WRITE:
+      return "typed_surface_write";
+
+   case SHADER_OPCODE_MEMORY_FENCE:
+      return "memory_fence";
+
    default:
       /* Yes, this leaks.  It's in debug code, it should never occur, and if
        * it does, you should just add the case to the list above.
-- 
1.8.3.4