[Mesa-dev] [PATCH] build: unify mesa version by using a VERSION file
Chad Versace
chad.versace at linux.intel.com
Thu Jul 25 11:39:31 PDT 2013
On 07/25/2013 11:22 AM, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Rather than having to keep track of all the build systems and their respecitve
>> definition of the mesa version, use a single top file VERSION. Every build
>> system is responsible for reading/parsing the file and using it
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov at gmail.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Hi guys
>> So here it is, just in time for the 9.3 dev cycle :)
>>
>> Automake is working fine and scons has been compile tested only - no nouveau
>> target available to test with ;(
>> I would appreciate if someone can test the Android build
>>
>> As usual any comments would be appreciated
>>
>> Regards
>> Emil
>> ---
>> Android.common.mk | 3 ++-
>> Makefile.am | 1 +
>> SConstruct | 5 ++++-
>> VERSION | 1 +
>> configure.ac | 3 ++-
>> docs/devinfo.html | 6 +-----
>> 6 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 VERSION
>>
>> diff --git a/Android.common.mk b/Android.common.mk
>> index c6ee4e1..61dc47a 100644
>> --- a/Android.common.mk
>> +++ b/Android.common.mk
>> @@ -33,9 +33,10 @@ endif
>> LOCAL_C_INCLUDES += \
>> $(MESA_TOP)/include
>>
>> +MESA_VERSION=$(cat $(MESA_TOP)\VERSION)
^^^
Android is Linux. Use '/', not '\'.
>> # define ANDROID_VERSION (e.g., 4.0.x => 0x0400)
>> LOCAL_CFLAGS += \
>> - -DPACKAGE_VERSION=\"9.2.0-devel\" \
>> + -DPACKAGE_VERSION=\"$(MESA_VERSION)\" \
>> -DPACKAGE_BUGREPORT=\"https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Mesa\" \
>> -DANDROID_VERSION=0x0$(MESA_ANDROID_MAJOR_VERSION)0$(MESA_ANDROID_MINOR_VERSION)
>>
I don't have time to test the Android build, but, having maintained it in the past,
I'm confident this hunk is correct, as long as the backslash is fixed.
>> diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am
>> index 29405a0..a4df949 100644
>> --- a/Makefile.am
>> +++ b/Makefile.am
>> @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ PACKAGE_NAME = MesaLib-$(PACKAGE_VERSION)
>> EXTRA_FILES = \
>> aclocal.m4 \
>> configure \
>> + VERSION \
>> bin/ar-lib \
>> bin/compile \
>> bin/config.sub \
>> diff --git a/SConstruct b/SConstruct
>> index 834e9d5..f401b83 100644
>> --- a/SConstruct
>> +++ b/SConstruct
>> @@ -69,8 +69,11 @@ if env['gles']:
>> #######################################################################
>> # Environment setup
>>
>> +fp = open("VERSION", "r")
>> +mesa_version = fp.read()
>> +fp.close()
This hunk would be a bit cleaner, and the close() avoided, if done like below.
By the way, according to `pydoc open`, "r" is the default open mode.
with open("VERSION") as f:
mesa_version = f.read()
>> diff --git a/VERSION b/VERSION
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..eabee27
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/VERSION
>> @@ -0,0 +1 @@
>> +9.2.0-devel
>> \ No newline at end of file
>> diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
>> index 3de0066..55e159d 100644
>> --- a/configure.ac
>> +++ b/configure.ac
>> @@ -6,7 +6,8 @@ dnl Tell the user about autoconf.html in the --help output
>> m4_divert_once([HELP_END], [
>> See docs/autoconf.html for more details on the options for Mesa.])
>>
>> -AC_INIT([Mesa], [9.2.0-devel],
>> +m4_define(MESA_VERSION, m4_include(VERSION))
>> +AC_INIT([Mesa], [MESA_VERSION],
>> [https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Mesa])
>> AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR([bin])
>> AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR([m4])
>> diff --git a/docs/devinfo.html b/docs/devinfo.html
>> index 5aad0fb..60c98f5 100644
>> --- a/docs/devinfo.html
>> +++ b/docs/devinfo.html
>> @@ -196,11 +196,7 @@ branch is relevant.
>> <h3>Verify and update version info</h3>
>>
>> <dl>
>> - <dt>SConstruct</dt>
>> - <dt>Android.common.mk</dt>
>> - <dd>PACKAGE_VERSION</dd>
>> - <dt>configure.ac</dt>
>> - <dd>AC_INIT</dd>
>> + <dt>VERSION</dt>
>> </dl>
>
> It's weird having a bulleted list with a single thing in it. Let's
> change this to "Verify and update the version info in VERSION" or
> similar.
>
> Otherwise,
>
> Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <mattst88 at gmail.com>
I agree with Matt's comments here.
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list