[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 2/2] Add test case for recently fixed loop-control underflow bug.

[Carl Worth]

To trigger the bug, it suffices to have a line-continuation followed by
a newline and then a non-line-continuation backslash.
---
 ...117-line-continuation-and-non-continuation-backslash.c |   12 ++++++++++++
 ...continuation-and-non-continuation-backslash.c.expected |   13 +++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 src/glsl/glcpp/tests/117-line-continuation-and-non-continuation-backslash.c
 create mode 100644 src/glsl/glcpp/tests/117-line-continuation-and-non-continuation-backslash.c.expected

diff --git a/src/glsl/glcpp/tests/117-line-continuation-and-non-continuation-backslash.c b/src/glsl/glcpp/tests/117-line-continuation-and-non-continuation-backslash.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6a6f282
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/glsl/glcpp/tests/117-line-continuation-and-non-continuation-backslash.c
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+/* This test case is the minimal case to replicate the bug reported here:
+ *
+ * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65112
+ *
+ * To trigger the bug, there must be a line-continuation sequence
+ * (backslash newline), then an additional newline character, and
+ * finally another backslash that is not part of a line-continuation
+ * sequence.
+ */
+\
+
+/* \ */
diff --git a/src/glsl/glcpp/tests/117-line-continuation-and-non-continuation-backslash.c.expected b/src/glsl/glcpp/tests/117-line-continuation-and-non-continuation-backslash.c.expected
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9b3eb67
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/glsl/glcpp/tests/117-line-continuation-and-non-continuation-backslash.c.expected
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ 
+
+
+ 
+
-- 
1.7.10.4