[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 7/9] radeon: Rename bo_handles hashtable to match its actual contents.

[christopher.halse.rogers at canonical.com]

From: Christopher James Halse Rogers <raof at ubuntu.com>

It's a map of GEM name->bo, so identify it as such
---
 src/gallium/winsys/radeon/drm/radeon_drm_bo.c | 16 ++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/gallium/winsys/radeon/drm/radeon_drm_bo.c b/src/gallium/winsys/radeon/drm/radeon_drm_bo.c
index 44fb503..5ddbc00 100644
--- a/src/gallium/winsys/radeon/drm/radeon_drm_bo.c
+++ b/src/gallium/winsys/radeon/drm/radeon_drm_bo.c
@@ -114,8 +114,8 @@ struct radeon_bomgr {
     /* Winsys. */
     struct radeon_drm_winsys *rws;
 
-    /* List of buffer handles and its mutex. */
-    struct util_hash_table *bo_handles;
+    /* List of buffer GEM names. Protected by bo_handles_mutex. */
+    struct util_hash_table *bo_names;
     pipe_mutex bo_handles_mutex;
     pipe_mutex bo_va_mutex;
 
@@ -372,7 +372,7 @@ static void radeon_bo_destroy(struct pb_buffer *_buf)
 
     if (bo->name) {
         pipe_mutex_lock(bo->mgr->bo_handles_mutex);
-        util_hash_table_remove(bo->mgr->bo_handles,
+        util_hash_table_remove(bo->mgr->bo_names,
                                (void*)(uintptr_t)bo->name);
         pipe_mutex_unlock(bo->mgr->bo_handles_mutex);
     }
@@ -660,7 +660,7 @@ static boolean radeon_bomgr_is_buffer_busy(struct pb_manager *_mgr,
 static void radeon_bomgr_destroy(struct pb_manager *_mgr)
 {
     struct radeon_bomgr *mgr = radeon_bomgr(_mgr);
-    util_hash_table_destroy(mgr->bo_handles);
+    util_hash_table_destroy(mgr->bo_names);
     pipe_mutex_destroy(mgr->bo_handles_mutex);
     pipe_mutex_destroy(mgr->bo_va_mutex);
     FREE(mgr);
@@ -692,7 +692,7 @@ struct pb_manager *radeon_bomgr_create(struct radeon_drm_winsys *rws)
     mgr->base.is_buffer_busy = radeon_bomgr_is_buffer_busy;
 
     mgr->rws = rws;
-    mgr->bo_handles = util_hash_table_create(handle_hash, handle_compare);
+    mgr->bo_names = util_hash_table_create(handle_hash, handle_compare);
     pipe_mutex_init(mgr->bo_handles_mutex);
     pipe_mutex_init(mgr->bo_va_mutex);
 
@@ -889,7 +889,7 @@ static struct pb_buffer *radeon_winsys_bo_from_handle(struct radeon_winsys *rws,
     pipe_mutex_lock(mgr->bo_handles_mutex);
 
     /* First check if there already is an existing bo for the handle. */
-    bo = util_hash_table_get(mgr->bo_handles, (void*)(uintptr_t)whandle->handle);
+    bo = util_hash_table_get(mgr->bo_names, (void*)(uintptr_t)whandle->handle);
     if (bo) {
         /* Increase the refcount. */
         struct pb_buffer *b = NULL;
@@ -923,7 +923,7 @@ static struct pb_buffer *radeon_winsys_bo_from_handle(struct radeon_winsys *rws,
     bo->va = 0;
     pipe_mutex_init(bo->map_mutex);
 
-    util_hash_table_set(mgr->bo_handles, (void*)(uintptr_t)whandle->handle, bo);
+    util_hash_table_set(mgr->bo_names, (void*)(uintptr_t)whandle->handle, bo);
 
 done:
     pipe_mutex_unlock(mgr->bo_handles_mutex);
@@ -989,7 +989,7 @@ static boolean radeon_winsys_bo_get_handle(struct pb_buffer *buffer,
             bo->flink = flink.name;
 
             pipe_mutex_lock(bo->mgr->bo_handles_mutex);
-            util_hash_table_set(bo->mgr->bo_handles, (void*)(uintptr_t)bo->flink, bo);
+            util_hash_table_set(bo->mgr->bo_names, (void*)(uintptr_t)bo->flink, bo);
             pipe_mutex_unlock(bo->mgr->bo_handles_mutex);
         }
         whandle->handle = bo->flink;
-- 
1.8.4.3