[Mesa-dev] Patch for include/GL/gl.h

Baptist BENOIST return_0 at live.com
Fri Oct 25 18:02:50 CEST 2013


Sorry for the weekly delay to answer, I am currently very busy.

>> Hello,
>>
>> You can find attached a patch to apply on the include/GL/gl.h file.
>>
>> This patch aims to fix a build issue with GCC when using the -DGL_GLEXT_LEGACY, -Werror and -Wundef flags. I have remarked the problem with Qt 5.1.1 (which I am packaging for NixOS) but it will occur on any build which combines these three flags.
>>
>> To clarify things:
>>
>> -Wundef tells the compiler to warn on any use of an undefined definition (#define THE_DEFINITION).
>> -Werror tells the compiler to transform any warning as an error.
>>
>> With these options, you cannot do:
>>
>> #if THE_DEFINITION
>>
>> when THE_DEFINITION has not been previously defined.
>>
>> You must do:
>>
>> #if defined(THE_DEFINITION) && THE_DEFINITION
>>
>>
>> Feel free to ask me anything about this ;-)

>>
>> diff -rupN Mesa-9.2.0-orig/include/GL/gl.h Mesa-9.2.0/include/GL/gl.h
>> --- Mesa-9.2.0-orig/include/GL/gl.h   2013-08-14 03:34:42.000000000 +0200
>> +++ Mesa-9.2.0/include/GL/gl.h        2013-09-24 19:34:58.319140812 +0200
>> @@ -2088,7 +2088,7 @@ typedef void (APIENTRYP PFNGLMULTITEXCOO
>>
>>
>>
>> -#if GL_ARB_shader_objects
>> +#if defined(GL_ARB_shaders_objects) && GL_ARB_shader_objects
>>
>>  #ifndef GL_MESA_shader_debug
>>  #define GL_MESA_shader_debug 1
> 
> Actually, I think it could be safely changed to just
> 
> #ifdef GL_ARB_shader_objects
>
> Would that be OK?

As long as you are OK with the facts that defining GL_ARB_shader_objects to 0 will result to entering such a condition, it's also OK for me.
In my patch, I only wanted to ensure a backward compatibility which even works with this uncommon case.

> Going further, I think we could just remove all the 
GL_MESA_shader_debug stuff from Mesa.  It's an old extension that's 
never really been used.  I'll put it on my to-do list.

As I rarely develop shaders, I cannot really  give you an interesting opinion about such a removal. As it seems that you already proceeded, let's see if someone really needed it ;-)

Thanks for your answer and downstream-openness.

Baptist
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/attachments/20131025/8c509cb0/attachment.html>


More information about the mesa-dev mailing list