For the sake of git-describe, I propose we tag the 10.0 fork point on master as 'mesa-10.0-fork', 'mesa-10.0-base', or something similair. How do people feel about that? It's been a long time since git-describe has given useful info. It's reported snb-magic for a looooooooong time. $ git-describe snb-magic-18845-g103824d