[Mesa-dev] Tagging the 10.0 fork for git-describe

[Chad Versace]

On 10/30/2013 02:16 PM, Paul Berry wrote:
> On 30 October 2013 14:13, Ian Romanick <idr at freedesktop.org> wrote:
>
>> On 10/30/2013 01:01 PM, Chad Versace wrote:
>>> For the sake of git-describe, I propose we tag the 10.0 fork
>>> point on master as 'mesa-10.0-fork', 'mesa-10.0-base', or
>>> something similair. How do people feel about that?
>>
>> I support this idea.
>>
>> To avoid confusion with tags on the branch, I think the tag should
>> reflect where master is going.  mesa-10.next?  mesa-10.1-devel?  I'm
>> open to suggestions.  I'll update the version with the first patch after
>> the tag.
>>
>
> I like the sound of mesa-10.1-devel.

Me too. I like mesa-10.1-devel.