[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 05/11] i965: Initialize all member variables of bblock_t on construction.

[Francisco Jerez]

The bblock_t object relies on the memory allocator zeroing out its
contents before it's initialized, which is quite an unusual practice
in the C++ world because it ties objects to some specific allocation
scheme, and gives unpredictable results when an object is created with
a different allocator -- Stack allocation, array allocation, or
aggregation inside a different object are some of the useful
possibilities that come to my mind.  Initialize all fields from the
constructor and stop using the zeroing allocator.
---
 src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_cfg.cpp | 3 ++-
 src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_cfg.h   | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_cfg.cpp b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_cfg.cpp
index f4cfcd5..6a886ce 100644
--- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_cfg.cpp
+++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_cfg.cpp
@@ -44,7 +44,8 @@ pop_stack(exec_list *list)
    return block;
 }
 
-bblock_t::bblock_t()
+bblock_t::bblock_t() :
+   start_ip(), end_ip(), block_num()
 {
    start = NULL;
    end = NULL;
diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_cfg.h b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_cfg.h
index 27bc8b6..505a5cf 100644
--- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_cfg.h
+++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_cfg.h
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ public:
 
 class bblock_t {
 public:
-   DECLARE_RZALLOC_CXX_OPERATORS(bblock_t)
+   DECLARE_RALLOC_CXX_OPERATORS(bblock_t)
 
    bblock_link *make_list(void *mem_ctx);
 
-- 
1.8.3.4