[Mesa-dev] exec_list question
Timothy Arceri
t_arceri at yahoo.com.au
Sun Jan 12 01:21:03 PST 2014
Ok please ignore I understand how exec_list works now. What I was trying
to do was silly I'll need to figure out a different solution sorry about
the noise.
On Sun, 2014-01-12 at 19:39 +1100, Timothy Arceri wrote:
> I just tried the below code which is much cleaner but it to causes the
> original list to lose the last node.
>
> exec_node *node = type->array_specifier->array_dimensions.head->next;
> for (/* nothing */; !node->is_tail_sentinel(); node = node->next) {
> array_specifier->array_dimensions.push_tail(node);
> }
>
> I originally thought the pointer was being freed by an access to the
> copied list somewhere but since foreach_list_safe makes things work
> there must be something else happening.
>
>
> On Sun, 2014-01-12 at 19:08 +1100, Timothy Arceri wrote:
> > Hi Guys,
> >
> > I've been chasing my tail most of the afternoon using exec_list
> > basically I was just trying to copy all but the first element from one
> > list to another using the code bellow.
> >
> > exec_list *copy_dims =
> > &type->array_specifier->array_dimensions;
> > int i = 0;
> > //TODO: has to be better way to copy all dimension but the
> > first one
> > foreach_list (node, copy_dims) {
> > if(i>0)
> > array_specifier->array_dimensions.push_tail(node);
> > i++;
> > }
> >
> > But when doing this the last element from the list I was coping FROM was
> > somehow being lost.
> >
> > Replacing foreach_list with foreach_list_safe seems to have fixed the
> > problem. However I don't really understand why is someone able to
> > explain to me what's happening here?
> >
>
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list