[Mesa-dev] Naming everything in src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi si_*

Andreas Hartmetz ahartmetz at gmail.com
Mon Jan 13 13:00:42 PST 2014


I don't have an fdo account or push rights. Can somebody else push it
for me please? I've added the Reviewed-by: lines so the patches only
need to be pushed now.

On Monday 13 January 2014 11:22:07 Marek Olšák wrote:
> For the series:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Marek Olšák <marek.olsak at amd.com>
> 
> Feel free to push this.
> 
> Marek
> 
> On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Andreas Hartmetz <ahartmetz at gmail.com> 
wrote:
> > Continuing here because the threads had diverged...
> > 
> > I've updated the patch series under the same URL and applied all the
> > suggested improvements. The variable renames are still in, but at the
> > very end so they are trivial to omit.
> > 
> > On Tuesday 07 January 2014 17:27:56 Andreas Hartmetz wrote:
> >> We have talked on IRC meanwhile:
> >> "Everywhere" was supposed to mean file names and data structures.
> >> 
> >> I have made a patch series (git link because file renames produce huge
> >> diffs) that renames *everything* away from r600 (and also radeonsi)
> >> to si, where it is actually about SI. In the such modified code it is
> >> then clear at first glance that only resources, textures and some
> >> other low-level interface code from R600 / generic Radeon are actually
> >> used in SI code.
> >> 
> >> The patch series is ordered by increasing controversy potential due
> >> to destruction of git blame history, so the last parts can be omitted
> >> if they are deemed too destructive to history. In my opinion, it is
> >> better to have code that is readable now than code that is less
> >> readable but with the possibility to look up how it became like that.
> >> 
> >> Michel said on IRC that he'd prefer to keep the name radeonsi_pipe.h/c,
> >> I disagree: If the library name is to be kept, there must be a break
> >> between radeonsi and si *somewhere*, and it is normal for library names
> >> to not correspond to any file name in the library. The same scheme is
> >> used in llvmpipe, llvmpipe lib / directory versus lp_* file names.
> >> 
> >> Here's the repository (branch is master):
> >> git git://anongit.kde.org/scratch/ahartmetz/mesa.git
> >> web http://quickgit.kde.org/?p=scratch%2Fahartmetz%2Fmesa.git
> >> 
> >> On Monday 06 January 2014 15:50:05 Marek Olšák wrote:
> >> > It sounds good, but I'd like the prefix to be si_ everywhere.
> >> > 
> >> > Marek
> >> > 
> >> > On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Andreas Hartmetz <ahartmetz at gmail.com>
> >> 
> >> wrote:
> >> > > Hello,
> >> > > 
> >> > > many of the files in radeonsi originally came from other places where
> >> > > they had different names and were never renamed.
> >> > > Most of them now have names that don't tell what the files are for
> >> > > (r600 is not actually the first hardware supported by them, they
> >> > > start
> >> > > at radeonsi), and even those with radeonsi are split between
> >> > > radeonsi_ and si_.
> >> > > si_ is shorter than radeonsi_, but inconsistent with the directory
> >> > > and
> >> > > library name. I still think it's the best option, but no strong
> >> > > opinion
> >> > > from me. If and when the files are renamed, the next step would be
> >> > > doing the same with the r600_ struct and function names.
> >> > > Does that sound good? I'll send the patches shortly if so.
> >> > > 
> >> > > Cheers,
> >> > > Andreas
> >> > > _______________________________________________
> >> > > mesa-dev mailing list
> >> > > mesa-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
> >> > > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev



More information about the mesa-dev mailing list