[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 6/9] glsl: Implement ARB_arrays_of_arrays support for constructors
Matt Turner
mattst88 at gmail.com
Thu Jan 16 16:45:38 PST 2014
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 10:27 PM, Timothy Arceri <t_arceri at yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Timothy Arceri <t_arceri at yahoo.com.au>
> ---
> src/glsl/ast_function.cpp | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/glsl/ast_function.cpp b/src/glsl/ast_function.cpp
> index 2d05d07..57aa45f 100644
> --- a/src/glsl/ast_function.cpp
> +++ b/src/glsl/ast_function.cpp
> @@ -734,6 +734,7 @@ process_array_constructor(exec_list *instructions,
> * Section 4.1.10 "Implicit Conversions.""
> */
> exec_list actual_parameters;
> +
> const unsigned parameter_count =
> process_parameters(instructions, &actual_parameters, parameters, state);
> bool is_unsized_array = constructor_type->is_unsized_array();
> @@ -752,8 +753,10 @@ process_array_constructor(exec_list *instructions,
>
> if (is_unsized_array) {
> constructor_type =
> - glsl_type::get_array_instance(constructor_type->element_type(),
> - parameter_count);
> + glsl_type::get_array_instance(constructor_type->element_type(),
> + parameter_count,
> + constructor_type->dimension_count);
> +
> assert(constructor_type != NULL);
> assert(constructor_type->length == parameter_count);
> }
> @@ -782,14 +785,49 @@ process_array_constructor(exec_list *instructions,
> }
> }
>
> - if (result->type != constructor_type->element_type()) {
> - _mesa_glsl_error(loc, state, "type error in array constructor: "
> - "expected: %s, found %s",
> - constructor_type->element_type()->name,
> - result->type->name);
> + if (constructor_type->dimension_count == 1 &&
> + result->type != constructor_type->element_type()) {
> + _mesa_glsl_error(loc, state, "type error in array constructor: "
> + "expected: %s, found %s",
> + constructor_type->element_type()->name,
> + result->type->name);
> return ir_rvalue::error_value(ctx);
> }
>
> + /* compare arrays of arrays dimensions, element type, and sizes*/
> + if (result->type->is_array()) {
> +
> + if (result->type->dimension_count != (constructor_type->dimension_count-1)) {
> + _mesa_glsl_error(loc, state, "type error in array constructor: "
> + "expected array with: %u dimension(s),"
> + " found %u dimension(s)",
> + constructor_type->dimension_count-1,
> + result->type->dimension_count);
> + return ir_rvalue::error_value(ctx);
> + }
> +
> + const glsl_type *expected_type = constructor_type->element_type();
> + const glsl_type *result_type = result->type;
> + for (unsigned i=0; i<result->type->dimension_count; i++) {
> + if (result_type->length != expected_type->length) {
> + _mesa_glsl_error(loc, state, "type error in array constructor: "
> + "expected array with size: %u,"
> + " found size %u",
> + expected_type->length,
> + result_type->length);
> + return ir_rvalue::error_value(ctx);
> + }
> + expected_type = expected_type->element_type();
> + result_type = result_type->element_type();
> + }
> +
> + if (expected_type != result_type) {
> + _mesa_glsl_error(loc, state, "type error in array constructor: "
> + "expected: %s",
> + expected_type->name);
> + }
> + }
> +
> /* Attempt to convert the parameter to a constant valued expression.
> * After doing so, track whether or not all the parameters to the
> * constructor are trivially constant valued expressions.
> @@ -808,7 +846,7 @@ process_array_constructor(exec_list *instructions,
> return new(ctx) ir_constant(constructor_type, &actual_parameters);
>
> ir_variable *var = new(ctx) ir_variable(constructor_type, "array_ctor",
> - ir_var_temporary);
> + ir_var_temporary);
> instructions->push_tail(var);
>
> int i = 0;
> --
> 1.8.3.1
There are just generally a bunch of unrelated whitespace changes in
this patch. I see some of them are replacing tabs with spaces, but
this just makes finding the functional differences in the patch
harder. If you're already modifying a line, feel free to fix up its
whitespace, but not on otherwise untouched lines. Actually, there are
some added lines with tabs too..
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list