[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 2/2] pipe-loader: Add support for render nodes v2
Tom Stellard
tom at stellard.net
Fri Jan 31 12:58:00 PST 2014
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 10:16:41PM +0000, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 27/01/14 16:13, Tom Stellard wrote:
> > From: Tom Stellard <thomas.stellard at amd.com>
> >
> > v2:
> > - Add missing call to pipe_loader_drm_release()
> > - Fix render node macros
> > - Drop render-node configure option
> > ---
> >
> > For reference, version 1 of this patch:
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/2013-October/047296.html
> >
> > .../auxiliary/pipe-loader/pipe_loader_drm.c | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 77 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/src/gallium/auxiliary/pipe-loader/pipe_loader_drm.c b/src/gallium/auxiliary/pipe-loader/pipe_loader_drm.c
> > index 9484db8..7a1af91 100644
> > --- a/src/gallium/auxiliary/pipe-loader/pipe_loader_drm.c
> > +++ b/src/gallium/auxiliary/pipe-loader/pipe_loader_drm.c
> > @@ -49,6 +49,11 @@
> > #include "util/u_dl.h"
> > #include "util/u_debug.h"
> >
> > +#define DRM_RENDER_NODE_DEV_NAME_FORMAT "%s/renderD%d"
> > +#define DRM_RENDER_NODE_MAX_NODES 63
> > +#define DRM_RENDER_NODE_MIN_MINOR 128
> > +#define DRM_RENDER_NODE_MAX_MINOR (DRM_RENDER_NODE_MIN_MINOR + DRM_RENDER_NODE_MAX_NODES)
> > +
> Hello gents,
> Slightly silly question here, so plese be gentle. Shouldn't the above
> defines come from a libdrm header ?
>
> Similar to the following (from xf86drm.h)
>
> #define DRM_DIR_NAME "/dev/dri"
> #define DRM_DEV_NAME "%s/card%d"
> #define DRM_CONTROL_DEV_NAME "%s/controlD%d"
>
> -Emil
I'm not sure about this, maybe David has an opinion.
-Tom
>
> > struct pipe_loader_drm_device {
> > struct pipe_loader_device base;
> > struct util_dl_library *lib;
> > @@ -152,18 +157,87 @@ open_drm_minor(int minor)
> > return open(path, O_RDWR, 0);
> > }
> >
> > +static int
> > +open_drm_render_node_minor(int minor)
> > +{
> > + char path[PATH_MAX];
> > + snprintf(path, sizeof(path), DRM_RENDER_NODE_DEV_NAME_FORMAT, DRM_DIR_NAME,
> > + minor);
> > + return open(path, O_RDWR, 0);
> > +}
> > +
> > int
> > pipe_loader_drm_probe(struct pipe_loader_device **devs, int ndev)
> > {
> > - int i, j, fd;
> > + int i, k, fd, num_render_node_devs;
> > + int j = 0;
> > +
> > + struct {
> > + unsigned vendor_id;
> > + unsigned chip_id;
> > + } render_node_devs[DRM_RENDER_NODE_MAX_NODES];
> > +
> > + /* Look for render nodes first */
> > + for (i = DRM_RENDER_NODE_MIN_MINOR, j = 0;
> > + i <= DRM_RENDER_NODE_MAX_MINOR; i++) {
> > + fd = open_drm_render_node_minor(i);
> > + struct pipe_loader_device *dev;
> > + if (fd < 0)
> > + continue;
> >
> > - for (i = 0, j = 0; i < DRM_MAX_MINOR; i++) {
> > + if (!pipe_loader_drm_probe_fd(&dev, fd, false)) {
> > + close(fd);
> > + continue;
> > + }
> > +
> > + render_node_devs[j].vendor_id = dev->u.pci.vendor_id;
> > + render_node_devs[j].chip_id = dev->u.pci.chip_id;
> > +
> > + if (j < ndev) {
> > + devs[j] = dev;
> > + } else {
> > + close(fd);
> > + dev->ops->release(&dev);
> > + }
> > + j++;
> > + }
> > +
> > + num_render_node_devs = j;
> > +
> > + /* Next look for drm devices. */
> > + for (i = 0; i < DRM_MAX_MINOR; i++) {
> > + struct pipe_loader_device *dev;
> > + boolean duplicate = FALSE;
> > fd = open_drm_minor(i);
> > if (fd < 0)
> > continue;
> >
> > - if (j >= ndev || !pipe_loader_drm_probe_fd(&devs[j], fd, true))
> > + if (!pipe_loader_drm_probe_fd(&dev, fd, true)) {
> > close(fd);
> > + continue;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* Check to make sure we aren't already accessing this device via
> > + * render nodes.
> > + */
> > + for (k = 0; k < num_render_node_devs; k++) {
> > + if (dev->u.pci.vendor_id == render_node_devs[k].vendor_id &&
> > + dev->u.pci.chip_id == render_node_devs[k].chip_id) {
> > + close(fd);
> > + dev->ops->release(&dev);
> > + duplicate = TRUE;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (duplicate)
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + if (j < ndev) {
> > + devs[j] = dev;
> > + } else {
> > + dev->ops->release(&dev);
> > + }
> >
> > j++;
> > }
> >
>
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list