[Mesa-dev] A couple more to make the preprocessor conform better

Kenneth Graunke kenneth at whitecape.org
Fri Jun 13 16:32:40 PDT 2014

On Friday, June 13, 2014 03:27:13 PM Carl Worth wrote:
> This continues my ongoing series to make the preprocessor conform more
> precisely to the specifications.
> I am sprinkling these patches out as I write and test them because they are
> each logically independent. If people would prefer that I batch them up and
> submit them as a single series, I can do that instead.
> I am adding "make check" tests for each of the issues I fix with each patch. 
> haven't been running piglit, but I will do a piglit run over the whole 
> before I push anything to ensure I haven't caused any regressions.
> With the two patches emailed here, there's only one logical change. I did
> write it in two pieces though, so I'm submitting it that way. If anyone 
> prefer these to be squashed, I could easily do that.
> -Carl

Both of these two are:
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth at whitecape.org>

This isn't as bad as I thought.  Also, I love the test cases :)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/attachments/20140613/225c6a89/attachment.sig>

More information about the mesa-dev mailing list