[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 2/7] i965/fs: Save push constant location information.
Pohjolainen, Topi
topi.pohjolainen at intel.com
Fri Mar 14 11:40:10 PDT 2014
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 11:48:51PM -0700, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
> Previously, both move_uniform_array_access_to_pull_constants() and
> setup_pull_constants() maintained stack-local arrays with this
> information. Storing this information will allow it to be used from
> multiple functions, allowing us to split and move code around.
>
> We'll also eventually want to pass pull constant location information
> to the SIMD16 compile. Saving this information will help us do that.
>
> Unfortunately, the two functions *cannot* share the contents of the
> array just yet. remove_dead_constants() renumbers all the UNIFORM
> registers to be contiguous starting at zero, so the two functions
> talk about uniforms using different names. We can't even remap them,
> since move_uniform_array_access_to_pull_constants() deletes UNIFORM
> registers that are only accessed with reladdr, so remove_dead_constants
> can't even see them.
>
> This situation will improve in the next few patches.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth at whitecape.org>
> ---
> src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs.cpp | 7 +++++--
> src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs.h | 6 ++++++
> src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs_visitor.cpp | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs.cpp b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs.cpp
> index c24d2f8..8faf401 100644
> --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs.cpp
> +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs.cpp
> @@ -1827,7 +1827,7 @@ fs_visitor::remove_dead_constants()
> void
> fs_visitor::move_uniform_array_access_to_pull_constants()
> {
> - int pull_constant_loc[uniforms];
> + pull_constant_loc = ralloc_array(mem_ctx, int, uniforms);
>
> for (unsigned int i = 0; i < uniforms; i++) {
> pull_constant_loc[i] = -1;
> @@ -1884,6 +1884,9 @@ fs_visitor::move_uniform_array_access_to_pull_constants()
> }
> }
> invalidate_live_intervals();
I'm confused. I wondered what was the reason for patch number four removing
this call. But this is not present in current master and the first patch does
not introduce it either. Leftover from somewhere else, perhaps?
> +
> + ralloc_free(pull_constant_loc);
> + pull_constant_loc = NULL;
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -1909,7 +1912,7 @@ fs_visitor::setup_pull_constants()
> */
> unsigned int pull_uniform_base = max_uniform_components;
>
> - int pull_constant_loc[uniforms];
> + pull_constant_loc = ralloc_array(mem_ctx, int, uniforms);
> for (unsigned int i = 0; i < uniforms; i++) {
> if (i < pull_uniform_base) {
> pull_constant_loc[i] = -1;
> diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs.h b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs.h
> index 86c95df..abfdb10 100644
> --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs.h
> +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs.h
> @@ -509,6 +509,12 @@ public:
> /** Number of uniform variable components visited. */
> unsigned uniforms;
>
> + /**
> + * Array mapping UNIFORM register numbers to the pull parameter index,
> + * or -1 if this uniform register isn't being uploaded as a pull constant.
> + */
> + int *pull_constant_loc;
> +
> /* This is the map from UNIFORM hw_reg + reg_offset as generated by
> * the visitor to the packed uniform number after
> * remove_dead_constants() that represents the actual uploaded
> diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs_visitor.cpp b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs_visitor.cpp
> index 90272eb..404af30 100644
> --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs_visitor.cpp
> +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs_visitor.cpp
> @@ -2971,6 +2971,7 @@ fs_visitor::fs_visitor(struct brw_context *brw,
> this->regs_live_at_ip = NULL;
>
> this->uniforms = 0;
> + this->pull_constant_loc = NULL;
> this->params_remap = NULL;
> this->nr_params_remap = 0;
>
> --
> 1.9.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> mesa-dev mailing list
> mesa-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list