[Mesa-dev] [PATCH v3 0/9] Gallium Nine

Jose Fonseca jfonseca at vmware.com
Sun Nov 16 03:44:47 PST 2014

Acked by me.

I didn't review the state tracker code, but at least I didn't notice anything wrong with the changes to the auxiliary modules, and I don't obecjt having this merged back in now that it is being actively maintained,


From: mesa-dev <mesa-dev-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org> on behalf of Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov at gmail.com>
Sent: 14 November 2014 14:14
To: David Heidelberg; mesa-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: emil.l.velikov at gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH v3 0/9] Gallium Nine

On 02/11/14 18:27, David Heidelberg wrote:
> Hello everyone!
> First I'd like thank you for great feedback.
> Sending third Gallium Nine merge request. We reduced number of commits
> to necessary minimum. I hope all proposed changes are incorporated in v3.
> Thank you

Can we get an acked-by/reviewed-by for this ? Would be a shame to
torture David to keep rebasing this for another three months.

Afaics he's already applied to commit access with the sole perpose to
maintain the state-tracker.

P.S. Patches 3 and 6 have minor comments to address. I don't mind if
patch 6 is resolved after the merge.
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev at lists.freedesktop.org

More information about the mesa-dev mailing list