[Mesa-dev] [PATCH] Set llvmpipe and softpipe note only for MSAA.

Roland Scheidegger sroland at vmware.com
Thu Nov 27 09:05:08 PST 2014


Sorry for that. Someone (== me) didn't realize he needs to push it :-).
Done that now.

Roland


Am 27.11.2014 um 01:53 schrieb Romain Failliot:
> Hi!
> 
> I'm not familiar with the "patch and merge" process, I just wonder if
> it is normal that my patch isn't merged yet (it's been more than 20
> days).
> I can wait, but I just want to be sure I'm not waiting for nothing :D
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> 2014-11-03 6:02 GMT-05:00 Roland Scheidegger <sroland at vmware.com>:
>>
>> Am 02.11.2014 um 18:35 schrieb Romain Failliot:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> Sorry if I'm doing this wrong, first time here. I've tried git
>>> send-mail, but I don't have an SMTP server so it wasn't working. Here is
>>> the simple commit (and the patch attached):
>>>
>>> Set llvmpipe and softpipe note only for MSAA.
>>>
>>> Right now, in mesamatrix.net
>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__mesamatrix.net&d=AAMFaQ&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=Vjtt0vs_iqoI31UfJxBl7yv9I2FeiaeAYgMTLKRBc_I&m=kzXQqa7IRw5KjPPr67fHHaH3RMVOcsUcvSFCWxNS8Vk&s=-N1IRI3obYJVa_Y2haMbftx-cr4yrp4pPyxX6LfcyqU&e=>,
>>> the footnote is set so that it seems to be
>>> for all the features, while actually it seems to be only for the MSAA.
>>>
>>
>>
>> I'm ok with that change. Well in the txt file it seemed to make sense to
>> add that as a footnote for GL 3.0 (because without it you're not truly
>> GL 3.0 compliant) but I see this causes problems with parsing.
>>
>> Roland
>>



More information about the mesa-dev mailing list