[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 0/3] cl workdim v2

[Jan Vesely]

[SNIP]
> > 
> > > I also don't like that this way there is no difference between
> > > explicit and implicit kernel arguments. On the other hand it's simple,
> > > and does not need additional per driver code.
> > >
> > Yeah...  We definitely want to hide these from the user, as e.g. the
> > CL_KERNEL_NUM_ARGS param is required by the spec to return the number of
> > arguments provided by the user, and we don't want the user to set
> > implicit args, so it gets a bit messy.  I think I like better your
> > original idea of passing them as launch_grid() arguments, even though
> > the grid offset and dimension parameters are somewhat artificial from a
> > the hardware's point of view.
> 
> sorry to bug you some more with this. I tried one more thing before
> going back to the launch_grid parameters. this time it implements a
> parallel infrastructure for implicit arguments by creating artificial
> module arguments for uint and size_t (I don't think we need more for
> implicit arguments).
> 
> I only added the work dimension argument but adding more should be easy.
> If you think that the launch_grid way is better, I'll stop experimenting
> as I ran out of ideas I wanted to try.

ping
should I just resend using git instead of attachments?

> 
> thanks,
> jan

[SNIP]

-- 
Jan Vesely <jan.vesely at rutgers.edu>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/attachments/20140922/a9b3f01b/attachment.sig>